Fix .cursor skills consistency: flow resolution, tracker-agnostic refs, report naming, error recovery

- Rewrite autopilot flow resolution to 4 deterministic rules based on source code + docs + state file presence
- Replace all hard-coded Jira references with tracker-agnostic terminology across 30+ files
- Move project-management.mdc to _project.md (project-specific, not portable with .cursor)
- Rename FINAL_implementation_report.md to context-dependent names (implementation_report_tests/features/refactor)
- Remove "acknowledged tech debt" option from test-run — failing tests must be fixed or removed
- Add debug/error recovery protocol to protocols.md
- Align directory paths: metrics -> 06_metrics/, add 05_security/, reviews/, 02_task_plans/ to README
- Add missing skills (test-spec, test-run, new-task, ui-design) to README
- Use language-appropriate comment syntax for Arrange/Act/Assert in coderule + testing rules
- Copy updated coderule.mdc to parent suite/.cursor/rules/
- Raise max task complexity from 5 to 8 points in decompose
- Skip test-spec Phase 4 (script generation) during planning context
- Document per-batch vs post-implement test run as intentional
- Add skill-internal state cross-check rule to state.md
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
2026-03-28 02:34:00 +02:00
parent cbf370c765
commit cdcd1f6ea7
33 changed files with 225 additions and 150 deletions
+7 -6
View File
@@ -1,20 +1,20 @@
# Task Specification Template
Create a focused behavioral specification that describes **what** the system should do, not **how** it should be built.
Save as `TASKS_DIR/[##]_[short_name].md` initially, then rename to `TASKS_DIR/[JIRA-ID]_[short_name].md` after Jira ticket creation.
Save as `TASKS_DIR/[##]_[short_name].md` initially, then rename to `TASKS_DIR/[TRACKER-ID]_[short_name].md` after work item ticket creation.
---
```markdown
# [Feature Name]
**Task**: [JIRA-ID]_[short_name]
**Task**: [TRACKER-ID]_[short_name]
**Name**: [short human name]
**Description**: [one-line description of what this task delivers]
**Complexity**: [1|2|3|5] points
**Complexity**: [1|2|3|5|8] points
**Dependencies**: [AZ-43_shared_models, AZ-44_db_migrations] or "None"
**Component**: [component name for context]
**Jira**: [TASK-ID]
**Tracker**: [TASK-ID]
**Epic**: [EPIC-ID]
## Problem
@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@ Then [expected result]
- 2 points: Non-trivial, low complexity, minimal coordination
- 3 points: Multi-step, moderate complexity, potential alignment needed
- 5 points: Difficult, interconnected logic, medium-high risk
- 8 points: Too complex — split into smaller tasks
- 8 points: High difficulty, high ambiguity or coordination, multiple components
- 13 points: Too complex — split into smaller tasks
## Output Guidelines
@@ -102,7 +103,7 @@ Then [expected result]
- Include realistic scope boundaries
- Write from the user's perspective
- Include complexity estimation
- Reference dependencies by Jira ID (e.g., AZ-43_shared_models)
- Reference dependencies by tracker ID (e.g., AZ-43_shared_models)
**DON'T:**
- Include implementation details (file paths, classes, methods)