---
name: blackbox-test-spec
description: |
  Black-box integration test specification skill. Analyzes input data completeness and produces
  detailed E2E test scenarios (functional + non-functional) that treat the system as a black box.
  2-phase workflow: input data completeness analysis, then test scenario specification.
  Produces 5 artifacts under integration_tests/.
  Trigger phrases:
  - "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec"
  - "test specification", "e2e test spec"
  - "test scenarios", "black box scenarios"
category: build
tags: [testing, black-box, integration-tests, e2e, test-specification, qa]
disable-model-invocation: true
---

# Black-Box Test Scenario Specification

Analyze input data completeness and produce detailed black-box integration test specifications. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs — they never reference internals.

## Core Principles

- **Black-box only**: tests describe observable behavior through public interfaces; no internal implementation details
- **Traceability**: every test traces to at least one acceptance criterion or restriction
- **Save immediately**: write artifacts to disk after each phase; never accumulate unsaved work
- **Ask, don't assume**: when requirements are ambiguous, ask the user before proceeding
- **Spec, don't code**: this workflow produces test specifications, never test implementation code

## Context Resolution

Fixed paths — no mode detection needed:

- PROBLEM_DIR: `_docs/00_problem/`
- SOLUTION_DIR: `_docs/01_solution/`
- DOCUMENT_DIR: `_docs/02_document/`
- TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR: `_docs/02_document/integration_tests/`

Announce the resolved paths to the user before proceeding.

## Input Specification

### Required Files

| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `_docs/00_problem/problem.md` | Problem description and context |
| `_docs/00_problem/acceptance_criteria.md` | Measurable acceptance criteria |
| `_docs/00_problem/restrictions.md` | Constraints and limitations |
| `_docs/00_problem/input_data/` | Reference data examples |
| `_docs/01_solution/solution.md` | Finalized solution |

### Optional Files (used when available)

| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.md` | System architecture for environment design |
| `DOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.md` | System flows for test scenario coverage |
| `DOCUMENT_DIR/components/` | Component specs for interface identification |

### Prerequisite Checks (BLOCKING)

1. `acceptance_criteria.md` exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
2. `restrictions.md` exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
3. `input_data/` exists and contains at least one file — **STOP if missing**
4. `problem.md` exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
5. `solution.md` exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
6. Create TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR if it does not exist
7. If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files, ask user: **resume from last checkpoint or start fresh?**

## Artifact Management

### Directory Structure

```
TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR/
├── environment.md
├── test_data.md
├── functional_tests.md
├── non_functional_tests.md
└── traceability_matrix.md
```

### Save Timing

| Phase | Save immediately after | Filename |
|-------|------------------------|----------|
| Phase 1a | Input data analysis (no file — findings feed Phase 1b) | — |
| Phase 1b | Environment spec | `environment.md` |
| Phase 1b | Test data spec | `test_data.md` |
| Phase 1b | Functional tests | `functional_tests.md` |
| Phase 1b | Non-functional tests | `non_functional_tests.md` |
| Phase 1b | Traceability matrix | `traceability_matrix.md` |

### Resumability

If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files:

1. List existing files and match them to the save timing table above
2. Identify which phase/artifacts are complete
3. Resume from the next incomplete artifact
4. Inform the user which artifacts are being skipped

## Progress Tracking

At the start of execution, create a TodoWrite with both phases. Update status as each phase completes.

## Workflow

### Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis

**Role**: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer
**Goal**: Assess whether the available input data is sufficient to build comprehensive test scenarios
**Constraints**: Analysis only — no test specs yet

1. Read `_docs/01_solution/solution.md`
2. Read `acceptance_criteria.md`, `restrictions.md`
3. Read testing strategy from solution.md (if present)
4. If `DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.md` and `DOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.md` exist, read them for additional context on system interfaces and flows
5. Analyze `input_data/` contents against:
   - Coverage of acceptance criteria scenarios
   - Coverage of restriction edge cases
   - Coverage of testing strategy requirements
6. Threshold: at least 70% coverage of the scenarios
7. If coverage is low, search the internet for supplementary data, assess quality with user, and if user agrees, add to `input_data/`
8. Present coverage assessment to user

**BLOCKING**: Do NOT proceed until user confirms the input data coverage is sufficient.

---

### Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification

**Role**: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer
**Goal**: Produce detailed black-box test specifications covering functional and non-functional scenarios
**Constraints**: Spec only — no test code. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs, not how the system is built.

Based on all acquired data, acceptance_criteria, and restrictions, form detailed test scenarios:

1. Define test environment using `.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-environment.md` as structure
2. Define test data management using `.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-test-data.md` as structure
3. Write functional test scenarios (positive + negative) using `.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-functional-tests.md` as structure
4. Write non-functional test scenarios (performance, resilience, security, edge cases) using `.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-non-functional-tests.md` as structure
5. Build traceability matrix using `.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-traceability-matrix.md` as structure

**Self-verification**:
- [ ] Every acceptance criterion is covered by at least one test scenario
- [ ] Every restriction is verified by at least one test scenario
- [ ] Positive and negative scenarios are balanced
- [ ] Consumer app has no direct access to system internals
- [ ] Docker environment is self-contained (`docker compose up` sufficient)
- [ ] External dependencies have mock/stub services defined
- [ ] Traceability matrix has no uncovered AC or restrictions

**Save action**: Write all files under TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR:
- `environment.md`
- `test_data.md`
- `functional_tests.md`
- `non_functional_tests.md`
- `traceability_matrix.md`

**BLOCKING**: Present test coverage summary (from traceability_matrix.md) to user. Do NOT proceed until confirmed.

Capture any new questions, findings, or insights that arise during test specification — these feed forward into downstream skills (plan, refactor, etc.).

---

## Escalation Rules

| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Missing acceptance_criteria.md, restrictions.md, or input_data/ | **STOP** — specification cannot proceed |
| Ambiguous requirements | ASK user |
| Input data coverage below 70% | Search internet for supplementary data, ASK user to validate |
| Test scenario conflicts with restrictions | ASK user to clarify intent |
| System interfaces unclear (no architecture.md) | ASK user or derive from solution.md |

## Common Mistakes

- **Referencing internals**: tests must be black-box — no internal module names, no direct DB queries against the system under test
- **Vague expected outcomes**: "works correctly" is not a test outcome; use specific measurable values
- **Missing negative scenarios**: every positive scenario category should have corresponding negative/edge-case tests
- **Untraceable tests**: every test should trace to at least one AC or restriction
- **Writing test code**: this skill produces specifications, never implementation code

## Trigger Conditions

When the user wants to:
- Specify black-box integration tests before implementation or refactoring
- Analyze input data completeness for test coverage
- Produce E2E test scenarios from acceptance criteria

**Keywords**: "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec", "test specification", "e2e test spec", "test scenarios"

## Methodology Quick Reference

```
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│       Black-Box Test Scenario Specification (2-Phase)           │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PREREQ: Data Gate (BLOCKING)                                    │
│   → verify AC, restrictions, input_data, solution exist         │
│                                                                │
│ Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis                      │
│   → assess input_data/ coverage vs AC scenarios (≥70%)          │
│   [BLOCKING: user confirms input data coverage]                │
│                                                                │
│ Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification                 │
│   → environment.md                                              │
│   → test_data.md                                                │
│   → functional_tests.md (positive + negative)                   │
│   → non_functional_tests.md (perf, resilience, security, limits)│
│   → traceability_matrix.md                                      │
│   [BLOCKING: user confirms test coverage]                      │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Principles: Black-box only · Traceability · Save immediately    │
│             Ask don't assume · Spec don't code                  │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```