10 KiB
name, description, category, tags, disable-model-invocation
| name | description | category | tags | disable-model-invocation | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| blackbox-test-spec | Black-box integration test specification skill. Analyzes input data completeness and produces detailed E2E test scenarios (functional + non-functional) that treat the system as a black box. 2-phase workflow: input data completeness analysis, then test scenario specification. Produces 5 artifacts under integration_tests/. Trigger phrases: - "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec" - "test specification", "e2e test spec" - "test scenarios", "black box scenarios" | build |
|
true |
Black-Box Test Scenario Specification
Analyze input data completeness and produce detailed black-box integration test specifications. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs — they never reference internals.
Core Principles
- Black-box only: tests describe observable behavior through public interfaces; no internal implementation details
- Traceability: every test traces to at least one acceptance criterion or restriction
- Save immediately: write artifacts to disk after each phase; never accumulate unsaved work
- Ask, don't assume: when requirements are ambiguous, ask the user before proceeding
- Spec, don't code: this workflow produces test specifications, never test implementation code
Context Resolution
Fixed paths — no mode detection needed:
- PROBLEM_DIR:
_docs/00_problem/ - SOLUTION_DIR:
_docs/01_solution/ - DOCUMENT_DIR:
_docs/02_document/ - TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR:
_docs/02_document/integration_tests/
Announce the resolved paths to the user before proceeding.
Input Specification
Required Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
_docs/00_problem/problem.md |
Problem description and context |
_docs/00_problem/acceptance_criteria.md |
Measurable acceptance criteria |
_docs/00_problem/restrictions.md |
Constraints and limitations |
_docs/00_problem/input_data/ |
Reference data examples |
_docs/01_solution/solution.md |
Finalized solution |
Optional Files (used when available)
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.md |
System architecture for environment design |
DOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.md |
System flows for test scenario coverage |
DOCUMENT_DIR/components/ |
Component specs for interface identification |
Prerequisite Checks (BLOCKING)
acceptance_criteria.mdexists and is non-empty — STOP if missingrestrictions.mdexists and is non-empty — STOP if missinginput_data/exists and contains at least one file — STOP if missingproblem.mdexists and is non-empty — STOP if missingsolution.mdexists and is non-empty — STOP if missing- Create TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR if it does not exist
- If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files, ask user: resume from last checkpoint or start fresh?
Artifact Management
Directory Structure
TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR/
├── environment.md
├── test_data.md
├── functional_tests.md
├── non_functional_tests.md
└── traceability_matrix.md
Save Timing
| Phase | Save immediately after | Filename |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 1a | Input data analysis (no file — findings feed Phase 1b) | — |
| Phase 1b | Environment spec | environment.md |
| Phase 1b | Test data spec | test_data.md |
| Phase 1b | Functional tests | functional_tests.md |
| Phase 1b | Non-functional tests | non_functional_tests.md |
| Phase 1b | Traceability matrix | traceability_matrix.md |
Resumability
If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files:
- List existing files and match them to the save timing table above
- Identify which phase/artifacts are complete
- Resume from the next incomplete artifact
- Inform the user which artifacts are being skipped
Progress Tracking
At the start of execution, create a TodoWrite with both phases. Update status as each phase completes.
Workflow
Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis
Role: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer Goal: Assess whether the available input data is sufficient to build comprehensive test scenarios Constraints: Analysis only — no test specs yet
- Read
_docs/01_solution/solution.md - Read
acceptance_criteria.md,restrictions.md - Read testing strategy from solution.md (if present)
- If
DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.mdandDOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.mdexist, read them for additional context on system interfaces and flows - Analyze
input_data/contents against:- Coverage of acceptance criteria scenarios
- Coverage of restriction edge cases
- Coverage of testing strategy requirements
- Threshold: at least 70% coverage of the scenarios
- If coverage is low, search the internet for supplementary data, assess quality with user, and if user agrees, add to
input_data/ - Present coverage assessment to user
BLOCKING: Do NOT proceed until user confirms the input data coverage is sufficient.
Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification
Role: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer Goal: Produce detailed black-box test specifications covering functional and non-functional scenarios Constraints: Spec only — no test code. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs, not how the system is built.
Based on all acquired data, acceptance_criteria, and restrictions, form detailed test scenarios:
- Define test environment using
.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-environment.mdas structure - Define test data management using
.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-test-data.mdas structure - Write functional test scenarios (positive + negative) using
.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-functional-tests.mdas structure - Write non-functional test scenarios (performance, resilience, security, edge cases) using
.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-non-functional-tests.mdas structure - Build traceability matrix using
.cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-traceability-matrix.mdas structure
Self-verification:
- Every acceptance criterion is covered by at least one test scenario
- Every restriction is verified by at least one test scenario
- Positive and negative scenarios are balanced
- Consumer app has no direct access to system internals
- Docker environment is self-contained (
docker compose upsufficient) - External dependencies have mock/stub services defined
- Traceability matrix has no uncovered AC or restrictions
Save action: Write all files under TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR:
environment.mdtest_data.mdfunctional_tests.mdnon_functional_tests.mdtraceability_matrix.md
BLOCKING: Present test coverage summary (from traceability_matrix.md) to user. Do NOT proceed until confirmed.
Capture any new questions, findings, or insights that arise during test specification — these feed forward into downstream skills (plan, refactor, etc.).
Escalation Rules
| Situation | Action |
|---|---|
| Missing acceptance_criteria.md, restrictions.md, or input_data/ | STOP — specification cannot proceed |
| Ambiguous requirements | ASK user |
| Input data coverage below 70% | Search internet for supplementary data, ASK user to validate |
| Test scenario conflicts with restrictions | ASK user to clarify intent |
| System interfaces unclear (no architecture.md) | ASK user or derive from solution.md |
Common Mistakes
- Referencing internals: tests must be black-box — no internal module names, no direct DB queries against the system under test
- Vague expected outcomes: "works correctly" is not a test outcome; use specific measurable values
- Missing negative scenarios: every positive scenario category should have corresponding negative/edge-case tests
- Untraceable tests: every test should trace to at least one AC or restriction
- Writing test code: this skill produces specifications, never implementation code
Trigger Conditions
When the user wants to:
- Specify black-box integration tests before implementation or refactoring
- Analyze input data completeness for test coverage
- Produce E2E test scenarios from acceptance criteria
Keywords: "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec", "test specification", "e2e test spec", "test scenarios"
Methodology Quick Reference
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Black-Box Test Scenario Specification (2-Phase) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PREREQ: Data Gate (BLOCKING) │
│ → verify AC, restrictions, input_data, solution exist │
│ │
│ Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis │
│ → assess input_data/ coverage vs AC scenarios (≥70%) │
│ [BLOCKING: user confirms input data coverage] │
│ │
│ Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification │
│ → environment.md │
│ → test_data.md │
│ → functional_tests.md (positive + negative) │
│ → non_functional_tests.md (perf, resilience, security, limits)│
│ → traceability_matrix.md │
│ [BLOCKING: user confirms test coverage] │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Principles: Black-box only · Traceability · Save immediately │
│ Ask don't assume · Spec don't code │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘