mirror of
https://github.com/azaion/gps-denied-desktop.git
synced 2026-04-22 21:46:36 +00:00
update metodology, add claude solution draft
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
@@ -0,0 +1,559 @@
|
||||
# UAV Aerial Image Geolocation System - Solution Draft
|
||||
|
||||
## 1. Product Solution Description
|
||||
|
||||
### Overview
|
||||
The system is a **hybrid Visual Odometry + Cross-View Matching pipeline** for GPS-denied aerial image geolocation. It combines:
|
||||
- **Incremental Visual Odometry (VO)** for relative pose estimation between consecutive frames
|
||||
- **Periodic Satellite Map Registration** to correct accumulated drift
|
||||
- **Structure from Motion (SfM)** for trajectory refinement
|
||||
- **Deep Learning-based Cross-View Matching** for absolute geolocation
|
||||
|
||||
### Core Components
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.1 Visual Odometry Pipeline
|
||||
Modern visual odometry approaches for UAVs use downward-facing cameras to track motion by analyzing changes in feature positions between consecutive frames, with correction methods using satellite imagery to reduce accumulated error.
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features:**
|
||||
- Monocular camera with planar ground assumption
|
||||
- Feature tracking using modern deep learning approaches
|
||||
- Scale recovery using altitude information (≤1km)
|
||||
- Drift correction via satellite image matching
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.2 Cross-View Matching Engine
|
||||
Cross-view geolocation matches aerial UAV images with georeferenced satellite images through coarse-to-fine matching stages, using deep learning networks to handle scale and illumination differences.
|
||||
|
||||
**Workflow:**
|
||||
1. **Coarse Matching**: Global descriptor extraction (NetVLAD) to find candidate regions
|
||||
2. **Fine Matching**: Local feature matching within candidates
|
||||
3. **Pose Estimation**: Homography/EPnP+RANSAC for geographic pose
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1.3 Structure from Motion (SfM)
|
||||
Structure from Motion uses multiple overlapping images to reconstruct 3D structure and camera poses, automatically performing camera calibration and requiring only 60% vertical overlap between images.
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
- Bundle adjustment for trajectory optimization
|
||||
- Incremental reconstruction for online processing
|
||||
- Multi-view stereo for terrain modeling (optional)
|
||||
|
||||
## 2. Architecture Approach
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.1 System Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Input Layer │
|
||||
│ - Sequential UAV Images (500-3000) │
|
||||
│ - Starting GPS Coordinates │
|
||||
│ - Flight Metadata (altitude, camera params) │
|
||||
└──────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌──────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Feature Extraction Module │
|
||||
│ ┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ Primary: SuperPoint + LightGlue (GPU) │ │
|
||||
│ │ Fallback: SIFT + FLANN (CPU) │ │
|
||||
│ │ Target: 1024-2048 keypoints/image │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
└──────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌──────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Sequential Processing Pipeline │
|
||||
│ │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 1. Visual Odometry Tracker │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Frame-to-frame matching │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Relative pose estimation │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Scale recovery (altitude) │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Outlier detection (350m check) │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ┌──────────────▼─────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 2. Incremental SfM (COLMAP-based) │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Bundle adjustment every N frames │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Track management │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Camera pose refinement │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
│ │ │
|
||||
│ ┌──────────────▼─────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ 3. Satellite Registration Module │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Triggered every 10-20 frames │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Cross-view matching │ │
|
||||
│ │ - Drift correction │ │
|
||||
│ │ - GPS coordinate assignment │ │
|
||||
│ └──────────────┬─────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
└─────────────────┼─────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────────▼─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Fallback & Quality Control │
|
||||
│ - Sharp turn detection (overlap <5%) │
|
||||
│ - User intervention request (<20% failure cases) │
|
||||
│ - Quality metrics logging (MRE, registration rate) │
|
||||
└─────────────────┬─────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│
|
||||
┌─────────────────▼─────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Output Layer │
|
||||
│ - GPS coordinates for each image center │
|
||||
│ - 6-DoF camera poses │
|
||||
│ - Confidence scores │
|
||||
│ - Sparse 3D point cloud │
|
||||
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.2 Technical Implementation
|
||||
|
||||
#### Feature Extraction & Matching
|
||||
LightGlue provides efficient local feature matching with adaptive inference, processing at 150 FPS for 1024 keypoints and outperforming SuperGlue in both speed and accuracy, making it suitable for real-time applications.
|
||||
|
||||
**Primary Stack:**
|
||||
- **Feature Detector**: SuperPoint (256-D descriptors, rotation invariant)
|
||||
- **Feature Matcher**: LightGlue (adaptive inference, early termination)
|
||||
- **Alternative**: DISK + LightGlue for better outdoor performance
|
||||
|
||||
**Configuration:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# SuperPoint + LightGlue configuration
|
||||
extractor = SuperPoint(max_num_keypoints=1024)
|
||||
matcher = LightGlue(
|
||||
features='superpoint',
|
||||
depth_confidence=0.9,
|
||||
width_confidence=0.95,
|
||||
flash_attention=True # 4-10x speedup
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Visual Odometry Component
|
||||
Visual odometry for high-altitude flights often assumes locally flat ground and solves motion through planar homography between ground images, with the scale determined by vehicle elevation.
|
||||
|
||||
**Method:**
|
||||
1. Extract features from consecutive frames (i, i+1)
|
||||
2. Match features using LightGlue
|
||||
3. Apply RANSAC for outlier rejection
|
||||
4. Compute essential matrix
|
||||
5. Recover relative pose (R, t)
|
||||
6. Scale using altitude: `scale = altitude / focal_length`
|
||||
7. Update trajectory
|
||||
|
||||
**Outlier Handling:**
|
||||
- Distance check: reject if displacement >350m between consecutive frames
|
||||
- Overlap check: require >5% feature overlap or trigger satellite matching
|
||||
- Angle threshold: <50° rotation between frames
|
||||
|
||||
#### Cross-View Satellite Matching
|
||||
Cross-view geolocation uses transformers with self-attention and cross-attention mechanisms to match drone images with satellite imagery, employing coarse-to-fine strategies with global descriptors like NetVLAD.
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
Offline Preparation:
|
||||
1. Download Google Maps tiles for flight region
|
||||
2. Build spatial quad-tree index
|
||||
3. Extract NetVLAD global descriptors (4096-D)
|
||||
4. Store in efficient retrieval database
|
||||
|
||||
Online Processing (every 10-20 frames):
|
||||
1. Extract global descriptor from current aerial image
|
||||
2. Retrieve top-K candidates (K=5-10) using L2 distance
|
||||
3. Fine matching using local features (SuperPoint+LightGlue)
|
||||
4. Homography estimation with RANSAC
|
||||
5. GPS coordinate calculation
|
||||
6. Apply correction to trajectory
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
#### Bundle Adjustment
|
||||
COLMAP provides incremental Structure-from-Motion with automatic camera calibration and bundle adjustment, reconstructing 3D structure and camera poses from overlapping images.
|
||||
|
||||
**Strategy:**
|
||||
- **Local BA**: Every 20 frames (maintain <2s processing time)
|
||||
- **Global BA**: After every 100 frames or satellite correction
|
||||
- **Fixed Parameters**: Altitude constraint, camera intrinsics (if known)
|
||||
- **Optimization**: Ceres Solver with Levenberg-Marquardt
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.3 Meeting Acceptance Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
| Criterion | Implementation Strategy |
|
||||
|-----------|------------------------|
|
||||
| 80% within 50m accuracy | VO + Satellite correction every 10-20 frames |
|
||||
| 60% within 20m accuracy | Fine-tuned cross-view matching + bundle adjustment |
|
||||
| Handle 350m outliers | RANSAC outlier rejection + distance threshold |
|
||||
| Handle sharp turns (<5% overlap) | Trigger satellite matching, skip VO |
|
||||
| <10% satellite outliers | Confidence scoring + verification matches |
|
||||
| User fallback (20% cases) | Automatic detection + GUI for manual GPS input |
|
||||
| <2 seconds per image | GPU acceleration, adaptive LightGlue, parallel processing |
|
||||
| >95% registration rate | Robust feature matching + multiple fallback strategies |
|
||||
| MRE <1.0 pixels | Iterative bundle adjustment + outlier filtering |
|
||||
|
||||
### 2.4 Technology Stack
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Libraries:**
|
||||
- **COLMAP**: SfM and bundle adjustment
|
||||
- **Kornia/PyTorch**: Deep learning feature extraction/matching
|
||||
- **OpenCV**: Image processing and classical CV
|
||||
- **NumPy/SciPy**: Numerical computations
|
||||
- **GDAL**: Geospatial data handling
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommended Hardware:**
|
||||
- **CPU**: 8+ cores (Intel i7/AMD Ryzen 7)
|
||||
- **GPU**: NVIDIA RTX 3080 or better (12GB+ VRAM)
|
||||
- **RAM**: 32GB minimum
|
||||
- **Storage**: SSD for fast I/O
|
||||
|
||||
## 3. Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.1 Functional Testing
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.1.1 Feature Extraction & Matching Tests
|
||||
**Objective**: Verify robust feature detection and matching
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Cases:**
|
||||
1. **Varied Illumination**
|
||||
- Sunny conditions (baseline)
|
||||
- Overcast conditions
|
||||
- Shadow-heavy areas
|
||||
- Different times of day
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Terrain Variations**
|
||||
- Urban areas (buildings, roads)
|
||||
- Rural areas (fields, forests)
|
||||
- Mixed terrain
|
||||
- Water bodies
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Image Quality**
|
||||
- FullHD (1920×1080)
|
||||
- 4K (3840×2160)
|
||||
- Maximum resolution (6252×4168)
|
||||
- Simulated motion blur
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Number of keypoints detected per image
|
||||
- Matching ratio (inliers/total matches)
|
||||
- Repeatability score
|
||||
- Processing time per image
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools:**
|
||||
- Custom Python test suite
|
||||
- Benchmark datasets (MegaDepth, HPatches)
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.1.2 Visual Odometry Tests
|
||||
**Objective**: Validate trajectory estimation accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Cases:**
|
||||
1. **Normal Flight Path**
|
||||
- Straight line flight (100m spacing)
|
||||
- Gradual turns (>20° overlap)
|
||||
- Consistent altitude
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Challenging Scenarios**
|
||||
- Sharp turns (trigger satellite matching)
|
||||
- Variable altitude (if applicable)
|
||||
- Low-texture areas (fields)
|
||||
- Repetitive structures (urban grid)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Outlier Handling**
|
||||
- Inject 350m displacement
|
||||
- Non-overlapping consecutive frames
|
||||
- Verify recovery mechanism
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Relative pose error (rotation and translation)
|
||||
- Trajectory drift (compared to ground truth)
|
||||
- Recovery time after outlier
|
||||
- Scale estimation accuracy
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.1.3 Cross-View Matching Tests
|
||||
**Objective**: Ensure accurate satellite registration
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Cases:**
|
||||
1. **Scale Variations**
|
||||
- Different altitudes (500m, 750m, 1000m)
|
||||
- Various GSD (Ground Sample Distance)
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Environmental Changes**
|
||||
- Temporal differences (satellite data age)
|
||||
- Seasonal variations
|
||||
- Construction/development changes
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Geographic Regions**
|
||||
- Test on multiple locations in Eastern/Southern Ukraine
|
||||
- Urban vs rural performance
|
||||
- Different Google Maps update frequencies
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Localization accuracy (meters)
|
||||
- Retrieval success rate (top-K candidates)
|
||||
- False positive rate
|
||||
- Processing time per registration
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.1.4 Integration Tests
|
||||
**Objective**: Validate end-to-end pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Cases:**
|
||||
1. **Complete Flight Sequences**
|
||||
- Process 500-image dataset
|
||||
- Process 1500-image dataset
|
||||
- Process 3000-image dataset
|
||||
|
||||
2. **User Fallback Mechanism**
|
||||
- Simulate failure cases
|
||||
- Test manual GPS input interface
|
||||
- Verify trajectory continuation
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Sharp Turn Recovery**
|
||||
- Multiple consecutive sharp turns
|
||||
- Recovery after extended non-overlap
|
||||
|
||||
**Metrics:**
|
||||
- Overall GPS accuracy (80% within 50m, 60% within 20m)
|
||||
- Total processing time
|
||||
- User intervention frequency
|
||||
- System stability (memory usage, crashes)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.2 Non-Functional Testing
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2.1 Performance Testing
|
||||
**Objective**: Meet <2 seconds per image requirement
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Scenarios:**
|
||||
1. **Processing Speed**
|
||||
- Measure per-image processing time
|
||||
- Identify bottlenecks (profiling)
|
||||
- Test with different hardware configurations
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Scalability**
|
||||
- 500 images
|
||||
- 1500 images
|
||||
- 3000 images
|
||||
- Monitor memory usage and CPU/GPU utilization
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Optimization**
|
||||
- GPU vs CPU performance
|
||||
- Batch processing efficiency
|
||||
- Parallel processing gains
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools:**
|
||||
- Python cProfile
|
||||
- NVIDIA Nsight
|
||||
- Memory profilers
|
||||
|
||||
**Target Metrics:**
|
||||
- Average: <1.5 seconds per image
|
||||
- 95th percentile: <2.0 seconds per image
|
||||
- Peak memory: <16GB RAM
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2.2 Accuracy Testing
|
||||
**Objective**: Validate GPS accuracy requirements
|
||||
|
||||
**Methodology:**
|
||||
1. **Ground Truth Collection**
|
||||
- Use high-accuracy GNSS/RTK measurements
|
||||
- Collect control points throughout flight path
|
||||
- Minimum 50 ground truth points per test flight
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Error Analysis**
|
||||
- Calculate 2D position error for each image
|
||||
- Generate error distribution histograms
|
||||
- Identify systematic errors
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Statistical Validation**
|
||||
- Verify 80% within 50m threshold
|
||||
- Verify 60% within 20m threshold
|
||||
- Calculate RMSE, mean, and median errors
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Flights:**
|
||||
- Minimum 10 different flights
|
||||
- Various conditions (time of day, terrain)
|
||||
- Different regions in operational area
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2.3 Robustness Testing
|
||||
**Objective**: Ensure system reliability under adverse conditions
|
||||
|
||||
**Test Cases:**
|
||||
1. **Image Registration Rate**
|
||||
- Target: >95% successful registration
|
||||
- Test with challenging image sequences
|
||||
- Analyze failure modes
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Mean Reprojection Error**
|
||||
- Target: <1.0 pixels
|
||||
- Test bundle adjustment convergence
|
||||
- Verify 3D point quality
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Outlier Detection**
|
||||
- Inject various outlier types
|
||||
- Measure detection rate
|
||||
- Verify no false negatives (missed outliers)
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Satellite Map Quality**
|
||||
- Test with outdated satellite imagery
|
||||
- Regions with limited coverage
|
||||
- Urban development changes
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.2.4 Stress Testing
|
||||
**Objective**: Test system limits and failure modes
|
||||
|
||||
**Scenarios:**
|
||||
1. **Extreme Conditions**
|
||||
- Maximum 3000 images
|
||||
- Highest resolution (6252×4168)
|
||||
- Extended flight duration
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Resource Constraints**
|
||||
- Limited GPU memory
|
||||
- CPU-only processing
|
||||
- Concurrent processing tasks
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Edge Cases**
|
||||
- All images in same location (no motion)
|
||||
- Completely featureless terrain
|
||||
- Extreme weather effects (if data available)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.3 Test Data Requirements
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.3.1 Synthetic Data
|
||||
**Purpose**: Controlled testing environment
|
||||
|
||||
**Generation:**
|
||||
- Simulate flights using game engines (Unreal Engine/Unity)
|
||||
- Generate ground truth poses
|
||||
- Vary parameters (altitude, speed, terrain)
|
||||
- Add realistic noise and artifacts
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.3.2 Real-World Data
|
||||
**Collection Requirements:**
|
||||
- 10+ flights with ground truth GPS
|
||||
- Diverse terrains (urban, rural, mixed)
|
||||
- Different times of day
|
||||
- Various weather conditions (within restrictions)
|
||||
- Coverage across operational area
|
||||
|
||||
**Annotation:**
|
||||
- Manual verification of GPS coordinates
|
||||
- Quality ratings for each image
|
||||
- Terrain type classification
|
||||
- Known challenging sections
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.4 Continuous Testing Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.4.1 Unit Tests
|
||||
- Feature extraction modules
|
||||
- Matching algorithms
|
||||
- Coordinate transformations
|
||||
- Utility functions
|
||||
- >80% code coverage target
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.4.2 Integration Tests
|
||||
- Component interactions
|
||||
- Data flow validation
|
||||
- Error handling
|
||||
- API consistency
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.4.3 Regression Tests
|
||||
- Performance benchmarks
|
||||
- Accuracy baselines
|
||||
- Automated on each code change
|
||||
- Prevent degradation
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3.4.4 Test Automation
|
||||
**CI/CD Pipeline:**
|
||||
```yaml
|
||||
Pipeline:
|
||||
1. Code commit
|
||||
2. Unit tests (pytest)
|
||||
3. Integration tests
|
||||
4. Performance benchmarks
|
||||
5. Generate test report
|
||||
6. Deploy if all pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Tools:**
|
||||
- pytest for Python testing
|
||||
- GitHub Actions / GitLab CI
|
||||
- Docker for environment consistency
|
||||
- Custom validation scripts
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.5 Test Metrics & Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
| Metric | Target | Test Method |
|
||||
|--------|--------|-------------|
|
||||
| GPS Accuracy (50m) | 80% | Real flight validation |
|
||||
| GPS Accuracy (20m) | 60% | Real flight validation |
|
||||
| Processing Speed | <2s/image | Performance profiling |
|
||||
| Registration Rate | >95% | Feature matching tests |
|
||||
| MRE | <1.0 pixels | Bundle adjustment analysis |
|
||||
| Outlier Detection | >99% | Synthetic outlier injection |
|
||||
| User Intervention | <20% | Complete flight processing |
|
||||
| System Uptime | >99% | Stress testing |
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.6 Test Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
**Required Documentation:**
|
||||
1. **Test Plan**: Comprehensive testing strategy
|
||||
2. **Test Cases**: Detailed test scenarios and steps
|
||||
3. **Test Data**: Description and location of datasets
|
||||
4. **Test Results**: Logs, metrics, and analysis
|
||||
5. **Bug Reports**: Issue tracking and resolution
|
||||
6. **Performance Reports**: Benchmarking results
|
||||
7. **User Acceptance Testing**: Validation with stakeholders
|
||||
|
||||
### 3.7 Best Practices
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Iterative Testing**: Test early and often throughout development
|
||||
2. **Realistic Data**: Use real flight data as much as possible
|
||||
3. **Version Control**: Track test data and results
|
||||
4. **Reproducibility**: Ensure tests can be replicated
|
||||
5. **Automation**: Automate repetitive tests
|
||||
6. **Monitoring**: Continuous performance tracking
|
||||
7. **Feedback Loop**: Incorporate test results into development
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Implementation Roadmap
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Core Development (Weeks 1-4)
|
||||
- Feature extraction pipeline (SuperPoint/LightGlue)
|
||||
- Visual odometry implementation
|
||||
- Basic bundle adjustment integration
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Cross-View Matching (Weeks 5-8)
|
||||
- Satellite tile download and indexing
|
||||
- NetVLAD descriptor extraction
|
||||
- Coarse-to-fine matching pipeline
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Integration & Optimization (Weeks 9-12)
|
||||
- End-to-end pipeline integration
|
||||
- Performance optimization (GPU, parallelization)
|
||||
- User fallback interface
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Testing & Validation (Weeks 13-16)
|
||||
- Comprehensive testing (all test cases)
|
||||
- Real-world validation flights
|
||||
- Performance tuning
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Deployment (Weeks 17-18)
|
||||
- Documentation
|
||||
- Deployment setup
|
||||
- Training materials
|
||||
|
||||
## 5. Risk Mitigation
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Mitigation |
|
||||
|------|------------|
|
||||
| Google Maps outdated | Multiple satellite sources, manual verification |
|
||||
| GPU unavailable | CPU fallback with SIFT |
|
||||
| Sharp turns | Automatic satellite matching trigger |
|
||||
| Featureless terrain | Reduced keypoint threshold, larger search radius |
|
||||
| Processing time > 2s | Adaptive LightGlue, parallel processing |
|
||||
| Poor lighting | Image enhancement preprocessing |
|
||||
|
||||
## 6. References & Resources
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Papers:**
|
||||
- SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Description (DeTone et al., 2018)
|
||||
- LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speed (Lindenberger et al., 2023)
|
||||
- CVM-Net: Cross-View Matching Network (Hu et al., 2018)
|
||||
- COLMAP: Structure-from-Motion Revisited (Schönberger et al., 2016)
|
||||
|
||||
**Software & Libraries:**
|
||||
- COLMAP: https://colmap.github.io/
|
||||
- Kornia: https://kornia.readthedocs.io/
|
||||
- Hierarchical Localization: https://github.com/cvg/Hierarchical-Localization
|
||||
- LightGlue: https://github.com/cvg/LightGlue
|
||||
|
||||
This solution provides a robust, scalable approach that meets all acceptance criteria while leveraging state-of-the-art computer vision and deep learning techniques.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user