more detailed SDLC plan

This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
2025-12-10 19:05:17 +02:00
parent 73cbe43397
commit fd75243a84
22 changed files with 2087 additions and 34 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
# Tech Stack Selection
## Initial data:
- Problem description: `@_docs/00_problem/problem_description.md`
- Restrictions: `@_docs/00_problem/restrictions.md`
- Acceptance criteria: `@_docs/00_problem/acceptance_criteria.md`
- Security approach: `@_docs/00_problem/security_approach.md`
- Solution draft: `@_docs/01_solution/solution.md`
## Role
You are a software architect evaluating technology choices
## Task
- Evaluate technology options against requirements
- Consider team expertise and learning curve
- Assess long-term maintainability
- Document selection rationale
## Output
### Requirements Analysis
#### Functional Requirements
| Requirement | Tech Implications |
|-------------|-------------------|
| [From acceptance criteria] | |
#### Non-Functional Requirements
| Requirement | Tech Implications |
|-------------|-------------------|
| Performance | |
| Scalability | |
| Security | |
| Maintainability | |
#### Constraints
| Constraint | Impact on Tech Choice |
|------------|----------------------|
| [From restrictions] | |
### Technology Evaluation
#### Programming Language
| Option | Pros | Cons | Score (1-5) |
|--------|------|------|-------------|
| | | | |
**Selection**: [Language]
**Rationale**: [Why this choice]
#### Framework
| Option | Pros | Cons | Score (1-5) |
|--------|------|------|-------------|
| | | | |
**Selection**: [Framework]
**Rationale**: [Why this choice]
#### Database
| Option | Pros | Cons | Score (1-5) |
|--------|------|------|-------------|
| | | | |
**Selection**: [Database]
**Rationale**: [Why this choice]
#### Infrastructure/Hosting
| Option | Pros | Cons | Score (1-5) |
|--------|------|------|-------------|
| | | | |
**Selection**: [Platform]
**Rationale**: [Why this choice]
#### Key Libraries/Dependencies
| Category | Library | Version | Purpose | Alternatives Considered |
|----------|---------|---------|---------|------------------------|
| | | | | |
### Evaluation Criteria
Rate each technology option against these criteria:
1. **Fitness for purpose**: Does it meet functional requirements?
2. **Performance**: Can it meet performance requirements?
3. **Security**: Does it have good security track record?
4. **Maturity**: Is it stable and well-maintained?
5. **Community**: Active community and documentation?
6. **Team expertise**: Does team have experience?
7. **Cost**: Licensing, hosting, operational costs?
8. **Scalability**: Can it grow with the project?
### Technology Stack Summary
```
Language: [Language] [Version]
Framework: [Framework] [Version]
Database: [Database] [Version]
Cache: [Cache solution]
Message Queue: [If applicable]
CI/CD: [Platform]
Hosting: [Platform]
Monitoring: [Tools]
```
### Risk Assessment
| Technology | Risk | Mitigation |
|------------|------|------------|
| | | |
### Learning Requirements
| Technology | Team Familiarity | Training Needed |
|------------|-----------------|-----------------|
| | High/Med/Low | Yes/No |
### Decision Record
**Decision**: [Summary of tech stack]
**Date**: [YYYY-MM-DD]
**Participants**: [Who was involved]
**Status**: Approved / Pending Review
Store output to `_docs/01_solution/tech_stack.md`
## Notes
- Avoid over-engineering - choose simplest solution that meets requirements
- Consider total cost of ownership, not just initial development
- Prefer proven technologies over cutting-edge unless required
- Document trade-offs for future reference
- Ask questions about team expertise and constraints