# Solution Draft: ViewPro Z40K vs USG-231 Camera Comparison

## Product Solution Description

Comparative analysis of two UAV gimbal cameras — ViewPro Z40K (Chinese, 4K, 3-axis) and USG-231 (Ukrainian/Ukrspecsystems, FHD, 2-axis) — for fixed-wing reconnaissance applications. The USG-231 is the standard payload on the Shark M UAV. The comparison focuses on video feed quality, wobble/jello effect, zoom performance, image crispness during zoom, and overall quality.

## Head-to-Head Specification Table


| Parameter             | ViewPro Z40K                       | USG-231                                     |
| --------------------- | ---------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- |
| **Sensor**            | Panasonic 1/2.3" CMOS, 25.9MP      | Sony CMOS (likely 1/2.8" STARVIS), ~2MP FHD |
| **Video Resolution**  | 4K (3840×2160) @ 25/30fps          | Full HD (1920×1080)                         |
| **Photo Resolution**  | 25.9MP (6784×3816)                 | N/A                                         |
| **Optical Zoom**      | 20x                                | 30x                                         |
| **Extended Zoom**     | 25x iA (4K) / 40x iA (FHD)         | 3x digital (total 90x)                      |
| **FOV (wide → tele)** | 62.95° → 3.45°                     | 63.7° → ~2.1°                               |
| **Gimbal**            | 3-axis                             | 2-axis                                      |
| **Gimbal Accuracy**   | ±0.02° pitch/roll, ±0.03° yaw      | Not published                               |
| **OIS**               | 5-axis Optical Image Stabilization | None (digital EIS only)                     |
| **Lens Aperture**     | F1.8 (wide) – F3.6 (tele)          | Not published                               |
| **Dynamic Range**     | 65 dB                              | Not published                               |
| **Min Illumination**  | 0.05 lux @ F1.6                    | If STARVIS: ~0.00008 lux                    |
| **Weight**            | 595g (all-in-one)                  | 840g (590g camera + 250g VPB)               |
| **Dimensions**        | Compact single unit                | 105×107×120mm + 50×90×65mm VPB              |
| **Temp Range**        | -20°C to +60°C                     | -15°C to +45°C (Shark M spec)               |
| **Autopilot Compat**  | PWM/TTL/SBUS/UDP                   | Pixhawk/Ardupilot plug-and-play             |
| **Object Tracking**   | Yes (up to 192 px/frame)           | Yes                                         |
| **Onboard Recording** | SD card up to 256GB                | Yes                                         |
| **IP Streaming**      | UDP output                         | RTP IP streaming                            |
| **Weather Sealing**   | CNC aluminum housing               | Weather sealed                              |
| **Price**             | $2,999–$4,879                      | Not public ("cost-effective")               |
| **Combat Proven**     | No public data                     | Yes (Shark UAV, Ukraine 2022–2026)          |


## Detailed Comparison by Dimension

### 1. Video Feed Quality

**Winner: ViewPro Z40K (decisive)**

The Z40K records native 4K video — 4× the pixel count of the USG-231's Full HD output. In practical terms, this means:

- A vehicle at 2 km rendered in 4K occupies roughly 4× more identifiable pixels than the same vehicle in FHD
- Post-mission analysis benefits enormously from 4K — you can digitally crop and zoom in post without losing usable detail
- For real-time feed: if the transmission link supports only FHD, the operator sees FHD anyway — but the Z40K's 4K downsampled to FHD is actually sharper than native FHD because it effectively oversamples and eliminates aliasing

The USG-231's Full HD feed is adequate for coordinate determination and target identification at moderate ranges (confirmed by Defense Express combat reporting). But it cannot match the Z40K's information density.

### 2. Wobble Effect

**Winner: ViewPro Z40K (decisive)**

This is the most architecturally significant difference between the two cameras.

**USG-231 (2-axis gimbal + digital EIS):**

- Stabilizes pitch and roll only
- Yaw rotation is NOT mechanically compensated
- On a fixed-wing drone in turns, wind gusts, or orbital surveillance, uncompensated yaw creates visible horizontal wobble/drift in the video feed
- Digital EIS attempts software correction: it crops the frame (losing resolution from an already-FHD signal), shifts pixels between frames, and can introduce warping artifacts during aggressive movement
- At high zoom (30x), even small uncompensated yaw angular errors translate to large image shifts — the wobble is amplified by magnification
- The wobble is most noticeable during: turns, wind gusts, turbulence, and any maneuver involving heading change

**ViewPro Z40K (3-axis gimbal + 5-axis OIS):**

- Compensates all three axes mechanically (pitch, roll, yaw) with ±0.02° accuracy
- The 5-axis OIS additionally corrects small/fast vibrations at the lens element level — no resolution loss, no cropping, no warping
- During turns and orbital surveillance, the yaw motor absorbs heading changes, keeping the image locked on target
- At 20x zoom, the ±0.02° accuracy translates to sub-pixel stability — effectively wobble-free for the viewer
- The double stabilization system (mechanical gimbal + optical OIS) is the same architecture used in DJI enterprise cameras

**Summary**: The USG-231 will exhibit noticeable wobble on a fixed-wing platform, particularly during maneuvering at high zoom. The Z40K eliminates wobble through dual mechanical+optical stabilization. This is not a marginal difference — it is an architectural category gap.

### 3. Zoom Capability

**Mixed result — depends on priority**


| Zoom Metric                      | ViewPro Z40K                  | USG-231                                         | Winner  |
| -------------------------------- | ----------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------- | ------- |
| Max optical zoom                 | 20x                           | 30x                                             | USG-231 |
| Max extended zoom (any mode)     | 40x iA (FHD)                  | 90x (30x optical × 3x digital)                  | USG-231 |
| Resolution at max optical zoom   | 8.29MP (4K) at 3.45° FOV      | ~2MP (FHD) at ~2.1° FOV                         | Z40K    |
| Pixels per degree at max optical | ~1,113 px/°                   | ~914 px/°                                       | Z40K    |
| Quality during extended zoom     | Gradual degradation (iA crop) | Significant degradation (digital crop from FHD) | Z40K    |


**Key insight**: The USG-231 zooms 50% further optically (30x vs 20x), but the Z40K still delivers 22% more pixels per degree of angular coverage at each camera's maximum optical zoom. The Z40K's resolution advantage outweighs the USG-231's zoom advantage for target identification.

However, if the mission absolutely requires maximum standoff distance and the image only needs to answer "is something there?" rather than "what exactly is it?", the USG-231's 30x optical reach has merit.

### 4. Image Crispness During Zoom

**Winner: ViewPro Z40K**

Multiple factors compound in the Z40K's favor:

1. **Base resolution**: 4K starting point vs FHD means 4× more pixels at any zoom level
2. **OIS vs EIS**: OIS preserves full resolution; EIS crops the frame, reducing effective resolution below FHD
3. **Pixel density at max zoom**: Z40K maintains 1,113 pixels per degree vs USG-231's 914 pixels per degree
4. **Vibration at zoom**: At high magnification, vibrations are amplified proportionally. The Z40K's 3-axis + OIS architecture maintains sub-pixel stability; the USG-231's 2-axis + EIS produces visible micro-jitter that degrades perceived sharpness

**At medium zoom (10-15x)**: Both cameras perform well. The resolution difference is visible but both produce usable imagery.

**At maximum optical zoom**: The Z40K's image is noticeably crisper. The 4K resolution provides fine detail that FHD cannot resolve. Both cameras will show atmospheric distortion (heat haze) at maximum zoom above hot terrain — this is physics, not a camera limitation.

**Beyond optical zoom (digital/iA range)**: The Z40K degrades more gracefully. Its iA zoom at 25x (4K) is cropping from a 25.9MP sensor — plenty of overhead. The USG-231 at 90x total is cropping from ~2MP — the image quality drops dramatically.

### 5. Shark M Video Feed Analysis

The Shark M uses the USG-231 as its standard EO payload. Based on Defense Express field reports and manufacturer data:

**Strengths of the USG-231 on Shark M:**

- Auto-tracking locks onto targets from 800m and handles both contrasting and complex objects
- 30x optical zoom allows observation from >1 km standoff
- Digital stabilization produces "clear and stable video" per manufacturer
- Plug-and-play integration with the Shark's Pixhawk-based autopilot
- Encrypted FHD transmission over 180 km (Silvus StreamCaster)
- Anti-fog feature works in the field
- Combat-proven reliability in intense EW environments

**Limitations observed/expected:**

- FHD resolution limits identification range compared to 4K alternatives
- 2-axis gimbal will produce wobble during orbital surveillance patterns (constant heading change)
- Digital EIS further reduces effective resolution under active correction
- At high zoom during maneuvering, the combined effect of uncompensated yaw + EIS cropping will noticeably degrade image quality
- No optical image stabilization means high-frequency airframe vibrations translate to micro-jitter in the feed

### 6. Low-Light Performance

**Likely winner: USG-231** (with caveat)

If the USG-231 uses a Sony STARVIS sensor (specs strongly suggest this), its low-light performance vastly exceeds the Z40K:

- USG-231 (STARVIS): ~0.00008 lux minimum illumination
- Z40K: 0.05 lux minimum illumination

This is a 625× difference. For dawn/dusk or night reconnaissance with ambient light, the USG-231 would produce usable imagery where the Z40K would show mostly noise.

**Caveat**: Ukrspecsystems does not publish the exact sensor module. The STARVIS identification is inferred from matching specifications with Sony FCB-EV9500L/9520L block cameras.

## Overall Quality Assessment


| Dimension                 | Z40K  | USG-231 | Margin             |
| ------------------------- | ----- | ------- | ------------------ |
| Video resolution          | ★★★★★ | ★★★     | Large              |
| Wobble control            | ★★★★★ | ★★☆     | Very large         |
| Optical zoom reach        | ★★★   | ★★★★★   | Moderate           |
| Image crispness at zoom   | ★★★★★ | ★★★     | Large              |
| Low-light                 | ★★★   | ★★★★★   | Large (if STARVIS) |
| Weight                    | ★★★★★ | ★★★     | Moderate           |
| Integration simplicity    | ★★★   | ★★★★★   | Moderate           |
| Combat-proven reliability | ★★    | ★★★★★   | Large              |
| Auto-tracking             | ★★★★  | ★★★★    | Comparable         |
| Overall video quality     | ★★★★★ | ★★★     | Large              |


## Recommendation

**For pure video quality, crispness, and wobble-free footage**: ViewPro Z40K is the clear winner. Its 4K resolution, 3-axis gimbal, and 5-axis OIS produce categorically better and more stable footage than the USG-231.

**The USG-231's strengths are real but different**: 30x optical zoom reach, likely superior low-light performance, combat-proven reliability, and seamless Shark M integration. It is a proven ISR tool — not the sharpest or smoothest, but reliable and field-tested.

**The architectural gap in stabilization is the most important finding.** The 2-axis vs 3-axis gimbal difference is not marginal — it is a fundamental design limitation of the USG-231 that manifests as visible wobble on fixed-wing platforms, especially at high zoom during turns. No amount of digital processing can fully compensate for the missing yaw stabilization axis.

**For a custom reconnaissance UAV build**: The Z40K offers superior imaging quality per gram. For integration with the Shark M ecosystem specifically, the USG-231 is the practical choice due to its plug-and-play integration and proven system-level reliability.

## References

1. ViewPro Z40K — RCDrone: [https://rcdrone.top/products/viewpro-z40k-4k-gimbal-camera](https://rcdrone.top/products/viewpro-z40k-4k-gimbal-camera)
2. ViewPro Z40K — Manufacturer: [https://www.viewprouav.com/product/z40k-single-4k-hd-25-times-zoom-gimbal-camera](https://www.viewprouav.com/product/z40k-single-4k-hd-25-times-zoom-gimbal-camera)
3. USG-231 — Ukrspecsystems: [https://ukrspecsystems.com/drone-gimbals/usg-231](https://ukrspecsystems.com/drone-gimbals/usg-231)
4. Shark M UAS — Ukrspecsystems: [https://ukrspecsystems.com/drones/shark-m-uas](https://ukrspecsystems.com/drones/shark-m-uas)
5. DRONExpert Z40K specs: [https://dronexpert.nl/en/viewpro-z40k-20x-optical-zoom-4k-camera-up-to-40x-zoom/](https://dronexpert.nl/en/viewpro-z40k-20x-optical-zoom-4k-camera-up-to-40x-zoom/)
6. AeroExpo USG-231: [https://www.aeroexpo.online/prod/ukrspecsystems/product-185884-82835.html](https://www.aeroexpo.online/prod/ukrspecsystems/product-185884-82835.html)
7. Defense Express — Shark combat footage: [https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/how_the_newest_ukrainian_shark_uav_works_over_donetsk_and_why_its_really_cool_video-5438.html](https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/how_the_newest_ukrainian_shark_uav_works_over_donetsk_and_why_its_really_cool_video-5438.html)
8. Camera Guide Pro — 2-axis vs 3-axis: [https://www.cameraguidepro.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-2-axis-and-3-axis-gimbal/](https://www.cameraguidepro.com/what-is-the-difference-between-a-2-axis-and-3-axis-gimbal/)
9. MakeUseOf — Gimbal comparison: [https://www.makeuseof.com/two-axis-vs-three-axis-gimbals/](https://www.makeuseof.com/two-axis-vs-three-axis-gimbals/)
10. DroneFlying Pro — 2-axis vs 3-axis: [https://droneflyingpro.com/2-axis-vs-3-axis-gimbal/](https://droneflyingpro.com/2-axis-vs-3-axis-gimbal/)
11. Steadxp — EIS vs OIS: [https://www.steadxp.com/digital-vs-optical-stabilization-a-comparison-guide/](https://www.steadxp.com/digital-vs-optical-stabilization-a-comparison-guide/)
12. Guiding Tech — EIS vs OIS: [https://www.guidingtech.com/eis-vs-ois-stabilization/](https://www.guidingtech.com/eis-vs-ois-stabilization/)
13. DroneTrest — Fixed-wing gimbal forum: [https://www.dronetrest.com/t/whats-the-best-choice-for-the-fixed-wing-3-axis-gimbal-or-2-axis-gimbal/8091](https://www.dronetrest.com/t/whats-the-best-choice-for-the-fixed-wing-3-axis-gimbal-or-2-axis-gimbal/8091)
14. PhantomPilots — Yaw issue with 2-axis: [https://phantompilots.com/threads/yaw-issue-with-2-axis-gimbals.6854](https://phantompilots.com/threads/yaw-issue-with-2-axis-gimbals.6854)
15. ViewPro Z40K Manual — ManualsLib: [https://www.manualslib.com/manual/2385515/Viewpro-Z40k.html](https://www.manualslib.com/manual/2385515/Viewpro-Z40k.html)
16. ViewPro Tech — Z40K PSDK: [https://www.viewprotech.com/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=202](https://www.viewprotech.com/index.php?ac=article&at=read&did=202)
17. Sony FCB-EV9500L: [https://pro.sony/ue_US/products/zoom-camera-blocks/fcb-ev9500l](https://pro.sony/ue_US/products/zoom-camera-blocks/fcb-ev9500l)
18. Sony FCB-EV9520L: [https://block-cameras.com/products/sony-fcb-ev9520l-30x-zoom-full-hd-block-camera-sensor-starvis-gen2](https://block-cameras.com/products/sony-fcb-ev9520l-30x-zoom-full-hd-block-camera-sensor-starvis-gen2)
19. DJI Zenmuse Z30 review: [https://medium.com/@daily_drones/hands-on-with-the-dji-zenmuse-z30-53ab50fe628c](https://medium.com/@daily_drones/hands-on-with-the-dji-zenmuse-z30-53ab50fe628c)
20. Oreate AI — Sensor size comparison: [https://www.oreateai.com/blog/beyond-the-numbers-what-123-vs-113-inch-sensor-size-really-means-for-your-photos/](https://www.oreateai.com/blog/beyond-the-numbers-what-123-vs-113-inch-sensor-size-really-means-for-your-photos/)
21. Wikipedia — Ukrspecsystems Shark: [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrspecsystems_Shark](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukrspecsystems_Shark)
22. Defense Express — Shark tracking demo: [https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/ukrainian_drone_maker_demonstrates_its_new_shark_uav_target_tracking_capabilities_video-4803.html](https://en.defence-ua.com/weapon_and_tech/ukrainian_drone_maker_demonstrates_its_new_shark_uav_target_tracking_capabilities_video-4803.html)

