# Code Review Report

**Batch**: AZ-243_integrate_production_native_vio_runtime
**Date**: 2026-05-06
**Verdict**: PASS

## Findings

No findings.

## Phase Summary

- Spec compliance: AC-1 is covered by production `VioRuntimeConfig` native-mode selection and `create_vio_adapter`; AC-2 is covered by BASALT runtime loader prerequisite errors; AC-3 is covered by explicit development replay mode and production replay-mode rejection.
- Code quality: The native runner loader, configured backend, and adapter factory keep backend-specific setup behind `src/vio_adapter/**` and preserve the public `VioBackend`/`VioAdapter` contracts.
- Security quick-scan: No secrets, subprocess calls, dynamic code execution, shell execution, or sensitive logging were introduced.
- Performance scan: Native runner creation is lazy and occurs during adapter initialization; per-packet processing remains delegated to the selected backend.
- Architecture compliance: Changed code stays inside VIO ownership and tests, imports only shared lower-layer contracts plus same-component modules, and introduces no cross-component cycles.

## Verification

- `python3 -m black src/vio_adapter tests/unit/test_vio_adapter.py tests/blackbox/test_vio_replay.py`
- `python3 -m ruff check src/vio_adapter tests/unit/test_vio_adapter.py tests/blackbox/test_vio_replay.py`
- `python3 -m pytest tests/unit/test_vio_adapter.py tests/blackbox/test_vio_replay.py`: 13 passed.
- `python3 -m pytest`: 87 passed.