Batch 1 implementation report (verdict PASS, 3 tasks completed, 12/13 ACs immediately covered, AZ-899 AC-4 forward-looking to first cycle-4 cumulative review). Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
5.9 KiB
Batch Report — cycle 4, batch 01
Batch: 01
Cycle: 4
Tasks: AZ-899, AZ-900, AZ-901
Total complexity: 3 SP (1 + 1 + 1)
Date: 2026-05-26
Commit: aa8b9f2 on dev
Task Selection
Wave-1 cycle-4 housekeeping. All three tasks are dependency-independent (no internal deps among themselves or against other cycle-4 work). Selected together because:
- Each is 1 SP, fits cleanly in a single review unit.
- All three are "cycle-N process housekeeping" with no source code under
src/touched — low blast radius, fast verification. - Picking these first lets the heavier batches (AZ-894 + AZ-896 CSV path, AZ-895 deprecation, AZ-897 UI) start with the leftover cleared and the retro gate codified.
Task Results
| Task | Status | Files Modified | Tests | AC Coverage | Issues |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AZ-899_architecture_compliance_baseline | Done | 1 added (_docs/02_document/architecture_compliance_baseline.md) |
Doc inspection (no executable test) | 3/4 immediate; AC-4 defers to first cycle-4 cumulative review | None |
| AZ-900_autodev_retro_existence_gate | Done | 2 modified (.cursor/skills/autodev/flows/existing-code.md, .cursor/skills/autodev/state.md) |
Doc inspection (no executable test) | 4/4 | None |
| AZ-901_evidence_out_default_path_fix | Done | 1 modified (e2e/runner/conftest.py), 1 deleted (_docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-26_evidence_out_default_path.md) |
python -m pytest e2e/tests/performance/ -v --tb=short → exit 0, 24 SKIPPED, evidence at <repo_root>/e2e-results/evidence/ (AC-1) |
5/5 | None |
File-Ownership Note
Module-layout has no Per-Component Mapping entry for pure-doc / workflow
tasks (_docs/02_document/process_docs/, .cursor/skills/). For AZ-899 and
AZ-900, OWNED was derived from the explicit files named in the task spec,
with FORBIDDEN broadly set to src/** (no source code touched). This is a
practical interpretation of implement-skill Step 4 for doc-only work; it
does not violate the skill's intent (no drift into unrelated source
components). AZ-901's e2e/runner/conftest.py falls cleanly under
blackbox_tests cross-cutting (Owns e2e/**).
AC Test Coverage
- AZ-899: 3/4 ACs verified immediately by structural file inspection.
AC-4 is a forward-looking AC that fires at the first cycle-4 cumulative
review (next K=3 batch boundary or end-of-cycle). The baseline file now
exists, so the cumulative-review skill will emit
## Baseline Deltastarting from its next run — no code or doc change in this batch can trigger AC-4 verification earlier. - AZ-900: 4/4 ACs verified by inspection of the modified flow + state
files. AC-4 (glob + date-range derivation) explicitly documents
_docs/06_metrics/retro_*.mdwithcycle_start =modification date of the latestimplementation_report_*_cycle{N-1}.mdfile (with fallback to latestretro_*.mdmtime, then to "yesterday"). - AZ-901: 5/5 ACs verified. AC-1 ran end-to-end as the per-task local test step.
Total: 12/13 ACs immediately covered. AZ-899 AC-4 is deferred-by-design (cannot fire until the cumulative-review skill runs).
Code Review Verdict: PASS
Lightweight inline review (per the implement skill's option for low-risk doc-only + small e2e-infra batches). Reasoning:
- Phase 1 (Context): all three task specs read; ACs walked through.
- Phase 2 (Spec Compliance): AC-by-AC walkthrough above; all immediate ACs satisfied.
- Phase 3 (Code Quality): 1 added option in
conftest.py, multi-line literal; usespathlib.Pathalready imported; help string accurately describes the new default. No new code in AZ-899 / AZ-900. - Phase 4 (Security): no security surface touched.
EVIDENCE_OUTdefault change does not relax any access control or trust boundary. - Phase 5 (Performance): no hot path touched.
- Phase 6 (Cross-task consistency): AZ-899 and AZ-900 both reference cycle-3 retro Top-3 items consistently; AZ-900's flow edit and state.md cross-reference both name the same gate ("Previous-Cycle Retro Existence Gate"). No conflicting patterns.
- Phase 7 (Architecture):
e2e/runner/conftest.pyis owned byblackbox_testscross-cutting permodule-layout.md:440; nosrc/code touched; no layer rule changed; no import added.
No @pytest.mark.xfail decorators removed → LESSONS 2026-05-26 [testing]
gate not engaged.
Auto-Fix Attempts: 0
Escalated Findings: 0
Stuck Tasks: 0
Tracker Transitions
| Ticket | Step 5 (→ In Progress) | Step 12 (→ In Testing) |
|---|---|---|
| AZ-899 | id 21, status In Progress (10001) confirmed |
id 32, status In Testing (10036) confirmed |
| AZ-900 | id 21, status In Progress (10001) confirmed |
id 32, status In Testing (10036) confirmed |
| AZ-901 | id 21, status In Progress (10001) confirmed |
id 32, status In Testing (10036) confirmed |
Both transitions executed via Jira MCP transitionJiraIssue after
getTransitionsForJiraIssue discovery (per LESSONS 2026-05-17). Read-back
verified the new status in the transition response body.
Leftovers / Tracker hygiene
- Closed:
_docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-26_evidence_out_default_path.md(deleted by AZ-901, AC-5). - Still open:
_docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-11_d_cross_cve_1_opencv_pin_deferred.md— gtsam numpy-2 wheel still not on PyPI; replay re-checked today; leftover remains open._docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-21_az777_complexity_override.md— decision-log audit trail (not a deferred write); AZ-777 already indone/; the file says it can be deleted but is fine to keep as historical record. Not in scope for this batch.
Next Batch
Batch 02 (cycle 4): AZ-894 + AZ-896 — CSV-driven replay adapter + operator-facing format docs / example CSV. 4 SP total; AZ-894 ↔ AZ-896 are co-dependent (either-order soft dep) so they ship together.