Files
gps-denied-onboard/.cursor/skills/research/references/comparison-frameworks.md
T
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh 1f634c2604
ci/woodpecker/push/02-build-push Pipeline failed
Update demo replay validation and testing documentation
- Modified the autodev state to reflect the current testing phase and details of the new `jetson-e2e` tests.
- Enhanced the "How to Test" documentation to provide clearer instructions on the demo replay validation process, including video and tlog alignment steps.
- Updated architectural documentation to include the new demo replay operator flow and its dependencies.
- Documented the removal of deprecated auto-sync features and clarified the operator-facing UI for replay validation.
- Added new entries in the dependencies table for upcoming tasks related to the demo replay flow.

These changes improve clarity and usability for operators and developers working with the demo replay system.
2026-06-20 11:24:43 +03:00

2.3 KiB

Comparison & Analysis Frameworks — Reference

General Dimensions (select as needed)

  1. Goal / What problem does it solve
  2. Working mechanism / Process
  3. Input / Output / Boundaries
  4. Advantages / Disadvantages / Trade-offs
  5. Applicable scenarios / Boundary conditions
  6. Cost / Benefit / Risk
  7. Historical evolution / Future trends
  8. Security / Permissions / Controllability

Concept Comparison Specific Dimensions

  1. Definition & essence
  2. Trigger / invocation method
  3. Execution agent
  4. Input/output & type constraints
  5. Determinism & repeatability
  6. Resource & context management
  7. Composition & reuse patterns
  8. Security boundaries & permission control

Decision Support Specific Dimensions

  1. Solution overview
  2. Implementation cost
  3. Maintenance cost
  4. Risk assessment
  5. Expected benefit
  6. Applicable scenarios
  7. Team capability requirements
  8. Migration difficulty

Decomposition Completeness Probes (Completeness Audit Reference)

Used during Step 1's Decomposition Completeness Audit. After generating sub-questions, ask each probe against the current decomposition. If a probe reveals an uncovered area, add a sub-question for it.

Probe What it catches
What does this cost — in money, time, resources, or trade-offs? Budget, pricing, licensing, tax, opportunity cost, maintenance burden
What are the hard constraints — physical, legal, regulatory, environmental? Regulations, certifications, spectrum/frequency rules, export controls, physics limits, IP restrictions
What are the dependencies and assumptions that could break? Supply chain, vendor lock-in, API stability, single points of failure, standards evolution
What does the operating environment actually look like? Terrain, weather, connectivity, infrastructure, power, latency, user skill level
What failure modes exist and what happens when they trigger? Degraded operation, fallback, safety margins, blast radius, recovery time
What do practitioners who solved similar problems say matters most? Field-tested priorities that don't appear in specs or papers
What changes over time — and what looks stable now but isn't? Technology roadmaps, regulatory shifts, deprecation risk, scaling effects