azaion/gps-denied-onboard
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/azaion/gps-denied-onboard.git synced 2026-04-22 23:06:37 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
Files
d7e1066c608b3b1e22f15f95d1228e0cb8f18edc
gps-denied-onboard/_standalone/camera_high_altitude/01_solution/solution_draft01.md
T

10 KiB
Raw Blame History

Solution Draft — Gimbal Camera for High-Altitude Balloon (10km)

Product Solution Description

A zoom gimbal camera mounted on a balloon at 10km altitude, producing imagery with 10-20 cm/pixel GSD to match an AI detection model trained on 600-1000m altitude data. The system must detect trucks, vehicles, and tracked machinery. Budget: under $30k.

The solution consists of: (1) a zoom gimbal camera with documented serial/TCP control protocol, (2) passive anti-rotation and pendulum damping suspension between the balloon and the camera, (3) a companion computer controlling the gimbal via serial/TCP/MAVLink, and (4) optional computational dehazing to improve image quality through 10km of atmosphere.

Balloon (10km)
    │
    ├── Anti-rotation swivel
    │
    ├── Pendulum damper / shock absorber
    │
    └── Camera payload bay (thermally protected)
         ├── Zoom gimbal camera (3-axis stabilized)
         ├── Companion computer (control + image capture)
         └── Power distribution

Existing/Competitor Solutions Analysis

Solution Altitude GSD Price Notes
UAVOS POD (HAPS) 15km 69 cm/pixel Unknown (>>$30k) Purpose-built for stratosphere. GSD too coarse for vehicle identification
Aerostat systems (SKYSTAR, Hemeria) 500-3500m Sub-meter $28k-500k+ Lower altitude, includes balloon+winch+camera. Purpose-built but wrong altitude range
Military gimbals (WESCAM MX-10) Any Sub-cm to m $100k-500k+ Best quality but far exceeds budget and has export restrictions
DJI Zenmuse H30T Drone altitude 5.7 cm @10km $10,240 Excellent camera but locked to DJI Matrice drones. Cannot be used on custom balloon platform

No off-the-shelf solution exists for a $30k camera on a 10km balloon with 10-20cm GSD. All viable approaches use drone gimbal cameras adapted for balloon mounting.

Architecture

Component: Zoom Gimbal Camera

Solution Sensor / Resolution Max FL / GSD@10km FOV@10km Integration Additional Sensors Weight Price Fit
ViewPro Z40K 1/2.3" 25.9MP ~102mm / 10.3 cm 606×453m Serial/TCP, ArduPilot ✅ AI tracking ~1kg $3,000-5,000 ⭐ Best value — highest resolution for price, largest FOV
A40TR Pro 1/2.8" 5MP 170mm / 11.6 cm 297×223m Serial/TCP, ArduPilot ✅ Thermal + LRF + AI ~1.5kg $7,499-7,999 ⭐ Best multi-sensor — thermal night ops, MIL-STD-810H, tightest pointing
SIYI ZT30 1/2.7" 8MP ~138mm / 12.0 cm 392×294m Serial, ArduPilot/PX4 ✅ Thermal + LRF + wide-angle ~1.2kg $6,099-7,309 Good versatility — 4 sensors, lowest power (9W), wide community support
ViewPro A40 Pro 1/2.8" 5MP 170mm / 11.6 cm 297×223m Serial/TCP, ArduPilot ✅ AI tracking ~1kg $2,299 Budget option — proven 40x zoom, lowest cost, but only 5MP/1080p
Sony α7RV + 400-800mm + T7 FF 61MP 800mm / 4.7 cm 447×298m Custom integration ⚠️ None ~5kg ~$10,850 Best image quality — full-frame, best haze resilience, complex integration
Sony RX10 IV + gimbal 1" 20MP 220mm / 11.0 cm 602×401m Custom integration ⚠️ None ~1.1kg+gimbal ~$4,200-5,200 Good sensor quality, wide FOV, but no remote zoom protocol

GSD Calculation Reference

GSD = (pixel_pitch × altitude) / focal_length

Example for Z40K:
  pixel_pitch = 6.17mm / 5888px = 1.048µm
  GSD = (0.001048mm × 10,000,000mm) / 102mm = 102.7mm ≈ 10.3 cm/pixel

Component: Passive Stabilization System

Solution Mechanism Advantages Limitations Cost Fit
Anti-rotation swivel + pendulum damper Mechanical swivel bearing at suspension point, viscous/spring dampers on suspension lines Proven in aerostat/balloon systems, no power needed, reduces rotation to near-zero Adds weight (1-3kg), requires custom fabrication $1,000-3,000 Recommended baseline
Passive pendulum (long suspension line) Increase distance between balloon and payload (5-10m line) Simple, reduces oscillation frequency Doesn't eliminate rotation, adds deployment complexity $200-500 Supplement to swivel
Reaction wheel (active) Motorized flywheel counters rotation torque Eliminates rotation completely Adds complexity, weight, and power draw $2,000-5,000 For demanding pointing requirements

Component: Companion Computer Integration

For this project, the existing GPS-Denied system runs on Jetson Orin Nano with MAVLink/MAVSDK. The gimbal camera integration would use the same companion computer architecture:

Approach Protocol Camera Support Complexity Fit
ArduPilot Lua driver (Viewpro) Viewlink serial A40 Pro, Z40K, A40TR Pro Low — use existing ArduPilot driver Best for Viewpro cameras
MAVLink Gimbal Protocol v2 MAVLink serial SIYI, Viewpro (via proxy) Low-Medium — standard protocol Best for SIYI cameras
Custom serial integration Manufacturer protocol Any with serial API Medium — write custom driver Fallback for any camera
USB/HDMI + Gremsy SDK USB + CAN Sony + Gremsy T7 High — separate camera and gimbal control Only option for Sony approach

Component: Image Preprocessing (Atmospheric Haze Mitigation)

Solution Approach Advantages Limitations Cost Fit
Dark Channel Prior dehazing Classic computer vision algorithm Fast, no training needed, well-proven May introduce artifacts, struggles with sky regions Free (OpenCV) Good baseline
CNN-based dehazing (AOD-Net, DehazeFormer) Deep learning single-image dehazing Better quality than classical, handles complex haze Needs GPU, adds latency (~50-100ms) Free (open source) Better quality, adds processing time
Multi-scale Retinex (MSR) Contrast enhancement Simple, fast, improves visibility Not true dehazing, may amplify noise Free (OpenCV) Quick alternative
No dehazing (sunny weather) Direct use No processing overhead May reduce AI model accuracy in hazy conditions Free Acceptable for clear conditions

Recommendations

Primary Recommendation: ViewPro Z40K ($3,000-5,000)

Rationale: Best value proposition for this specific use case.

  • 25.9MP resolution — by far the highest among integrated gimbal cameras in this price range
  • 10.3 cm/pixel GSD at max zoom — directly matches training data range
  • 606×453m FOV — covers the largest ground area per frame, meaning more vehicles visible per image
  • 4K video output for live monitoring
  • Documented Viewlink serial protocol with existing ArduPilot driver
  • ~1kg weight, ~15-25W power
  • $3,000-5,000 leaves ample budget for integration, spares, and contingency

Total estimated system cost: $5,000-8,000 (camera + passive stabilization + integration hardware)

Secondary Recommendation: A40TR Pro ($7,499-7,999)

When to choose instead: If you need night/thermal operation, laser ranging for target distance, or require MIL-STD-810H environmental certification. The thermal camera enables 24/7 operation and backup detection when optical imagery is degraded.

Trade-off: 5MP EO resolution is significantly lower than Z40K's 25.9MP, resulting in 4x smaller ground coverage per frame. For pure AI detection in daylight, Z40K is better.

Total estimated system cost: $9,000-12,000

Alternative: Sony α7RV + FE 400-800mm + Gremsy T7 (~$10,850)

When to choose: If atmospheric haze proves too degrading for small-sensor cameras, the full-frame sensor provides significantly better contrast and SNR. This is the "maximum image quality" option.

Risks:

  • Camera+lens weight (3,140g) is at the Gremsy T7 payload limit (3,175g) — virtually no margin
  • No turnkey integration — requires custom camera control, zoom control, and photo trigger
  • Sony camera rated 0-40°C only (balloon thermal protection must maintain this range)
  • Most complex and heaviest system

Total estimated system cost: $13,850-15,850

Testing Strategy

Integration / Functional Tests

  • Mount camera on test platform, verify serial/TCP control of zoom, pan, tilt, and photo capture
  • Verify image capture at different zoom levels and calculate actual GSD against predictions
  • Test passive stabilization mock-up with simulated balloon motion (pendulum, rotation)
  • Verify power budget under sustained operation (camera + gimbal + companion computer)

Non-Functional Tests

  • Ground-level test: photograph known-size vehicles from maximum available height and verify AI model detection at target GSD (resize images to simulate 10km GSD)
  • Atmospheric test: if possible, test from lower altitude (1-2km) and compare image quality with/without dehazing
  • Duration test: run camera continuously for 4+ hours to verify thermal stability and reliability
  • Balloon integration test: short tethered balloon flight at lower altitude to validate stabilization and control

References

Reference in New Issue View Git Blame Copy Permalink