azaion/loader
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/azaion/loader.git synced 2026-04-22 21:46:32 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[AZ-187] Rules & cleanup

Browse Source 
Made-with: Cursor
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
2026-04-17 18:54:04 +03:00
parent cfed26ff8c
commit d883fdb3cc
33 changed files with 1917 additions and 515 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.cursor/skills/research/references/comparison-frameworks.md
+14
View File
@@ -32,3 +32,17 @@
6. Applicable scenarios
7. Team capability requirements
8. Migration difficulty
## Decomposition Completeness Probes (Completeness Audit Reference)
Used during Step 1's Decomposition Completeness Audit. After generating sub-questions, ask each probe against the current decomposition. If a probe reveals an uncovered area, add a sub-question for it.
| Probe | What it catches |
|-------|-----------------|
| **What does this cost — in money, time, resources, or trade-offs?** | Budget, pricing, licensing, tax, opportunity cost, maintenance burden |
| **What are the hard constraints — physical, legal, regulatory, environmental?** | Regulations, certifications, spectrum/frequency rules, export controls, physics limits, IP restrictions |
| **What are the dependencies and assumptions that could break?** | Supply chain, vendor lock-in, API stability, single points of failure, standards evolution |
| **What does the operating environment actually look like?** | Terrain, weather, connectivity, infrastructure, power, latency, user skill level |
| **What failure modes exist and what happens when they trigger?** | Degraded operation, fallback, safety margins, blast radius, recovery time |
| **What do practitioners who solved similar problems say matters most?** | Field-tested priorities that don't appear in specs or papers |
| **What changes over time — and what looks stable now but isn't?** | Technology roadmaps, regulatory shifts, deprecation risk, scaling effects |
.cursor/skills/research/references/quality-checklists.md
+6
View File
@@ -10,6 +10,12 @@
- [ ] Every citation can be directly verified by the user (source verifiability)
- [ ] Structure hierarchy is clear; executives can quickly locate information
## Decomposition Completeness
- [ ] Domain discovery search executed: searched "key factors when [problem domain]" before starting research
- [ ] Completeness probes applied: every probe from `references/comparison-frameworks.md` checked against sub-questions
- [ ] No uncovered areas remain: all gaps filled with sub-questions or justified as not applicable
## Internet Search Depth
- [ ] Every sub-question was searched with at least 3-5 different query variants