Enhance test infrastructure and configuration for JWKS and Docker setup

- Updated Azaion.Missions.csproj to exclude test sources from service compilation, preventing build failures due to test project dependencies.
- Modified docker-compose.test.yml to preload the pg_stat_statements extension for testing and adjusted JWT refresh intervals for better test execution timing.
- Enhanced Dockerfile to install wget for health checks and ensure proper initialization of the container.
- Introduced a test-only endpoint for JWKS refresh to facilitate end-to-end testing without relying on the default refresh intervals.
- Updated DTOs in ApiDtos.cs to reflect camelCase naming conventions for consistency with service responses.
- Improved test cases to handle JWKS rotation and refresh scenarios effectively, ensuring robust validation of JWT handling.

This commit lays the groundwork for more reliable and efficient testing of the Azaion.Missions project.

_docs/04_refactoring/02-baseline-cleanup/FINAL_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,59 @@
+# FINAL Report — `02-baseline-cleanup`
+
+**Date**: 2026-05-16
+**Mode**: automatic
+**Workflow**: quick-assessment (phases 0 → 2 only)
+**Epic**: [AZ-587](https://denyspopov.atlassian.net/browse/AZ-587)
+**Tasks**: [AZ-588](https://denyspopov.atlassian.net/browse/AZ-588) (1 SP)
+
+## Why this was a quick-assessment run
+
+The 2026-05-14 architecture-compliance baseline scan flagged 4 findings (F1–F4). By the time this refactor pass started:
+
+- F1, F2 (High Architecture) — resolved 2026-05-14 by a doc retag in `_docs/02_document/module-layout.md`.
+- F3 (Low Maintainability) — resolved by the missions/vehicles rename; the file in question (`Flight.cs` → `Mission.cs`) no longer carries the dead `using`.
+- F4 (Low Maintainability) — partial: 2 of the 3 originally-empty scaffolding directories (`Entities/`, `DTOs/Requests/`) remain; `Infrastructure/` is now legitimately used.
+
+That left **a single actionable change**: delete two empty directories. The user explicitly chose **B (quick-assessment, phases 0–2 only)** at the Phase 0 BLOCKING gate, then **E (no hardening tracks)** at the Phase 1 + 2b combined gate. Phases 3–7 (safety net, execution, test-sync, verification, documentation) are intentionally not run by this skill — the actual change lands through `/implement` in the Phase B feature cycle alongside any other Phase B work, picked up from the task ticket created here.
+
+## Phases Executed
+
+| Phase | Status | Output |
+|-------|--------|--------|
+| 0 — Baseline | Done | `baseline_metrics.md` |
+| 1 — Discovery | Done (1a + 1b skipped, 1c done, 1d done) | `discovery/logical_flow_analysis.md`, `list-of-changes.md` |
+| 2a — Deep Research | Done (no library replacement → no `context7` / MVE) | `analysis/research_findings.md` |
+| 2b — Hardening Tracks | Done | User chose E (None) |
+| 2c — Create Epic | Done | AZ-587 |
+| 2d — Task Decomposition | Done | AZ-588, `_docs/tasks/todo/AZ-588_refactor_remove_empty_scaffolding_dirs.md` |
+| 3 — Safety Net | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
+| 4 — Execution | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
+| 5 — Test Sync | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
+| 6 — Verification | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
+| 7 — Documentation | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
+
+## Baseline vs Final Metrics
+
+Quick-assessment runs do not produce post-change metrics — Phase 6 (Verification) is the comparison step, and it is cancelled by definition. The baseline captured in `baseline_metrics.md` carries forward as the reference point for the next refactor run or for the implement skill when AZ-588 is picked up.
+
+## Changes Summary
+
+| ID | Status | Tracker | Description |
+|----|--------|---------|-------------|
+| C01 | Selected, decomposed, queued for `/implement` | AZ-588 | Remove `Entities/` and `DTOs/Requests/` |
+
+## Remaining Items
+
+Recorded for visibility in `list-of-changes.md` ("Out of Scope") — none of these are refactor work:
+
+| Item | Where it belongs |
+|------|------------------|
+| Add `docker-cli` to e2e-consumer image (would unlock the 30 environment-skipped tests) | Phase B `New Task` (test-infrastructure improvement, not a refactor) |
+| Reconcile AC-1.4 carry-forward (NFT-RES-08) | Phase B `New Task` (product/spec decision) |
+| Reconcile AC-4.6 carry-forward (NFT-RES-02) | Phase B `New Task` (product/spec decision) |
+| Test/source compilation separation (`Compile Remove="tests/**"`) | Already landed in the prior `/test-run` cycle |
+
+## Lessons Learned
+
+- The architecture-baseline scan was 2 days old at the start of this refactor. By the time the run began, 3 of the 4 findings had already been resolved through other workflows (rename PRs and doc retags). For small projects on rapid cycles, a refactor pass should always re-validate baseline-scan findings against the current tree before committing to a full 8-phase workflow.
+- The skill's `Phase 1 → Skip condition (Targeted mode)` clause covers the case where docs already exist; quick-assessment + automatic mode benefits from the same skip when the only finding is structural cleanup with zero new code paths. Followed it pragmatically here; could be promoted to an explicit "structural-cleanup mode" in a future skill revision if this pattern recurs.