# FINAL Report — `02-baseline-cleanup`

**Date**: 2026-05-16
**Mode**: automatic
**Workflow**: quick-assessment (phases 0 → 2 only)
**Epic**: [AZ-587](https://denyspopov.atlassian.net/browse/AZ-587)
**Tasks**: [AZ-588](https://denyspopov.atlassian.net/browse/AZ-588) (1 SP)

## Why this was a quick-assessment run

The 2026-05-14 architecture-compliance baseline scan flagged 4 findings (F1–F4). By the time this refactor pass started:

- F1, F2 (High Architecture) — resolved 2026-05-14 by a doc retag in `_docs/02_document/module-layout.md`.
- F3 (Low Maintainability) — resolved by the missions/vehicles rename; the file in question (`Flight.cs` → `Mission.cs`) no longer carries the dead `using`.
- F4 (Low Maintainability) — partial: 2 of the 3 originally-empty scaffolding directories (`Entities/`, `DTOs/Requests/`) remain; `Infrastructure/` is now legitimately used.

That left **a single actionable change**: delete two empty directories. The user explicitly chose **B (quick-assessment, phases 0–2 only)** at the Phase 0 BLOCKING gate, then **E (no hardening tracks)** at the Phase 1 + 2b combined gate. Phases 3–7 (safety net, execution, test-sync, verification, documentation) are intentionally not run by this skill — the actual change lands through `/implement` in the Phase B feature cycle alongside any other Phase B work, picked up from the task ticket created here.

## Phases Executed

| Phase | Status | Output |
|-------|--------|--------|
| 0 — Baseline | Done | `baseline_metrics.md` |
| 1 — Discovery | Done (1a + 1b skipped, 1c done, 1d done) | `discovery/logical_flow_analysis.md`, `list-of-changes.md` |
| 2a — Deep Research | Done (no library replacement → no `context7` / MVE) | `analysis/research_findings.md` |
| 2b — Hardening Tracks | Done | User chose E (None) |
| 2c — Create Epic | Done | AZ-587 |
| 2d — Task Decomposition | Done | AZ-588, `_docs/tasks/todo/AZ-588_refactor_remove_empty_scaffolding_dirs.md` |
| 3 — Safety Net | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
| 4 — Execution | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
| 5 — Test Sync | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
| 6 — Verification | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |
| 7 — Documentation | Cancelled | Quick-assessment scope |

## Baseline vs Final Metrics

Quick-assessment runs do not produce post-change metrics — Phase 6 (Verification) is the comparison step, and it is cancelled by definition. The baseline captured in `baseline_metrics.md` carries forward as the reference point for the next refactor run or for the implement skill when AZ-588 is picked up.

## Changes Summary

| ID | Status | Tracker | Description |
|----|--------|---------|-------------|
| C01 | Selected, decomposed, queued for `/implement` | AZ-588 | Remove `Entities/` and `DTOs/Requests/` |

## Remaining Items

Recorded for visibility in `list-of-changes.md` ("Out of Scope") — none of these are refactor work:

| Item | Where it belongs |
|------|------------------|
| Add `docker-cli` to e2e-consumer image (would unlock the 30 environment-skipped tests) | Phase B `New Task` (test-infrastructure improvement, not a refactor) |
| Reconcile AC-1.4 carry-forward (NFT-RES-08) | Phase B `New Task` (product/spec decision) |
| Reconcile AC-4.6 carry-forward (NFT-RES-02) | Phase B `New Task` (product/spec decision) |
| Test/source compilation separation (`Compile Remove="tests/**"`) | Already landed in the prior `/test-run` cycle |

## Lessons Learned

- The architecture-baseline scan was 2 days old at the start of this refactor. By the time the run began, 3 of the 4 findings had already been resolved through other workflows (rename PRs and doc retags). For small projects on rapid cycles, a refactor pass should always re-validate baseline-scan findings against the current tree before committing to a full 8-phase workflow.
- The skill's `Phase 1 → Skip condition (Targeted mode)` clause covers the case where docs already exist; quick-assessment + automatic mode benefits from the same skip when the only finding is structural cleanup with zero new code paths. Followed it pragmatically here; could be promoted to an explicit "structural-cleanup mode" in a future skill revision if this pattern recurs.