# Performance Test Scenarios

## PT-01: Single Tile Download Latency

**Trigger**: GET /api/satellite/tiles/latlon (uncached tile)
**Load**: 1 request
**Expected**: Response within 30s (includes Google Maps round-trip)
**Pass criterion**: Response time < 30000ms; HTTP 200

## PT-02: Cached Tile Retrieval Latency

**Trigger**: GET /api/satellite/tiles/latlon (cached tile)
**Load**: 1 request
**Expected**: Response within 500ms (DB lookup + response)
**Pass criterion**: Response time < 500ms; HTTP 200

## PT-03: Region Processing Throughput (200m)

**Trigger**: POST /api/satellite/request with 200m region
**Load**: 1 region
**Expected**: Complete processing within 60s
**Pass criterion**: status="completed" within 60s; tiles downloaded > 0

## PT-04: Region Processing Throughput (500m with stitch)

**Trigger**: POST /api/satellite/request with 500m region + stitch
**Load**: 1 region
**Expected**: Complete processing within 120s (more tiles + stitching)
**Pass criterion**: status="completed" within 120s; stitched image exists

## PT-05: Concurrent Region Requests

**Trigger**: 5 simultaneous POST /api/satellite/request (different coordinates)
**Load**: 5 concurrent requests
**Expected**: All queued immediately; all complete within 5 minutes
**Pass criterion**: All 5 regions reach status="completed"; queue does not reject

## PT-06: Route Point Interpolation Speed

**Trigger**: POST /api/satellite/route with 20 points
**Load**: 1 request
**Expected**: Route created (with interpolation) within 5s
**Pass criterion**: HTTP 200 response within 5000ms; totalPoints > 20

## PT-07: GetTilesByRegionAsync Latency Post-AZ-484 (multi-source baseline)

**Trigger**: TileRepository.GetTilesByRegionAsync exercised via POST /api/satellite/request (200m region, zoom 18) against a tiles table seeded with the pre-AZ-484 data shape (single-source rows backfilled to source='google_maps').
**Load**: 1 request, repeated 20 times to get a stable distribution.
**Expected**: 95th-percentile latency must not regress more than 10% vs the pre-AZ-484 baseline measured against PT-03 / PT-04. The new 5-column unique index `idx_tiles_unique_location_source` covers the same `(latitude, longitude, tile_zoom, tile_size_meters)` filter columns as the pre-AZ-484 4-column index, so no regression is expected.
**Pass criterion**: p95(GetTilesByRegionAsync) ≤ 1.10 × pre-AZ-484 p95 baseline.
**Source**: AZ-484 NFR (Performance) — `_docs/02_tasks/done/AZ-484_multi_source_tile_storage.md` § Non-Functional Requirements.
**Note**: This NFR is recorded for tracking. Active enforcement (running PT-07 against a real workload and comparing) is deferred to autodev Step 15 (Performance Test) when a baseline run is available. Until then, the integration test `MostRecentAcrossSourcesSelection_AZ484_AC2` provides correctness coverage for the new query shape.

## PT-08: UAV Tile Batch Upload Latency

**Status**: **Deferred — harness work tracked in `_docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-11_perf-pt07-harness.md`.** PT-08 reuses the same perf harness expansion (baseline capture + p95 ratio computation) that PT-07 is waiting for; no separate runner-script scenario was added in this commit. Active enforcement starts at cycle 2 Step 15 once the PT-07 harness lands.

**Trigger**: `POST /api/satellite/upload` exercised via the integration test fixtures generated by `UavTileImageFactory.CreateRandomJpeg` — a single 10-item batch of 256×256 / ~50 KiB JPEGs carrying a valid `GPS` JWT.
**Load**: 1 request, repeated 20 times to get a stable distribution.
**Expected**: Per-item quality-gate cost target < 50 ms (Rule 5 dominates — luminance variance after the 32×32 downsample). End-to-end p95 for a 10-item batch < 2 s on the dev hardware (8-core x86 baseline; revise on hardware change).
**Pass criterion**: `p95(UploadUavTileBatch[10 items]) ≤ 2000ms` AND `p95(UavTileQualityGate.Validate[single item]) ≤ 50ms`.
**Source**: AZ-488 NFR (Performance) — `_docs/02_tasks/done/AZ-488_uav_tile_upload.md` § Non-Functional Requirements.
**Process compliance**: AZ-488 § Risk 4 + cycle 1 retro Action 2 require that PT-08 ship with a runner-script scenario in the same commit OR be marked Deferred with a tracked follow-up. This entry takes the Deferred branch because the PT-07 harness expansion is the prerequisite for both scenarios, and a duplicated stub-runner for PT-08 would diverge from PT-07 once the real harness lands.