mirror of
https://github.com/azaion/satellite-provider.git
synced 2026-06-21 21:41:13 +00:00
fcd494f67e
Mirror of AZ-794 (inventory z/x/y rename). RequestRegionRequest.cs renames C#
props Latitude→Lat / Longitude→Lon and adds [JsonPropertyName("lat"/"lon")] so
the wire format is unambiguous under the AZ-795 strict-parsing stack
(UnmappedMemberHandling.Disallow → legacy {"latitude":..,"longitude":..} now
returns HTTP 400 instead of silently coercing).
Updates all in-repo consumers: API handler (Program.cs), integration tests
(Models.cs, RegionTests.cs, IdempotentPostTests.cs, SecurityTests.cs), the
performance harness (run-performance-tests.sh PT-03/04/05/07), and module
docs (common_dtos.md, api_program.md; system-flows.md F2 already used
lat/lon). New RegionFieldRenameTests.cs covers AC-4 both directions (new
format → 200, legacy format → 400). Smoke green; no regressions.
region-request.md contract doc not bumped here — AZ-808 publishes v1.0.0
directly with the post-rename names per AZ-812 coordination clause.
Batch 01 of cycle 8. PASS_WITH_WARNINGS (one Low DRY finding for follow-up
test-helper consolidation; details in
_docs/03_implementation/reviews/batch_01_cycle8_review.md).
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
4.4 KiB
4.4 KiB
Code Review Report
Batch: 01 (cycle 8) Tasks: AZ-812 (Region API field rename Latitude/Longitude → Lat/Lon, OSM convention) Date: 2026-05-22 Verdict: PASS_WITH_WARNINGS
Findings
| # | Severity | Category | File:Line | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Low | Maintainability | SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/RegionFieldRenameTests.cs:79 |
AssertErrorsContainsMention copy-pasted from TileInventoryValidationTests.cs |
Finding Details
F1: AssertErrorsContainsMention copy-pasted from TileInventoryValidationTests.cs (Low / Maintainability)
- Location:
SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/RegionFieldRenameTests.cs:79-110(and the prior copy atTileInventoryValidationTests.cs:396-428) - Description: The new
RegionFieldRenameTests.cscopies the privateAssertErrorsContainsMentionhelper verbatim fromTileInventoryValidationTests.cs. Both helpers walk the sameerrorsobject and assert a mention exists in either keys or messages. - Suggestion: Promote the helper to
ProblemDetailsAssertions.cs(the natural home for cross-test ProblemDetails assertions) and migrate both tests in a small follow-up cleanup. NOT done in this batch — touching the cycle-7 file is out of AZ-812 scope. Tracked as future hygiene, not a regression. - Task: AZ-812
Phase Summary
| Phase | Outcome |
|---|---|
| 1. Context Loading | Read AZ-812 spec + _docs/02_document/module-layout.md. Scope is the Region POST DTO rename. |
| 2. Spec Compliance | AC-1 ✓ (DTO has Lat/Lon + JsonPropertyName), AC-2 ✓ (wire format end-to-end with lat/lon), AC-3 ✓ (RegionTests.cs happy-path updated), AC-4 ✓ (RegionFieldRenameTests validates both directions, smoke green), AC-5 ✓ (common_dtos.md, api_program.md, system-flows.md updated/verified), AC-6 ✓ (region-request.md does not yet exist — AZ-808 will publish v1.0.0 directly with new names per spec coordination). No Spec-Gap. |
| 3. Code Quality | Mechanical DTO rename, clean. One DRY violation (F1) — Low severity. |
| 4. Security | No SQL injection, no hardcoded secrets, no sensitive data in logs. New test uses GUID + test coordinates only. |
| 5. Performance | No perf impact (field rename). No N+1, no blocking I/O. |
| 6. Cross-Task Consistency | Single-task batch — N/A. |
| 7. Architecture Compliance | DTO in SatelliteProvider.Common/DTO/ (Common layer, importable by all). Test in SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/ (test layer). No layering violations, no cycles, no Public-API bypasses, no ADR violations. |
Files Reviewed
SatelliteProvider.Common/DTO/RequestRegionRequest.cs(DTO rename +[JsonPropertyName]attrs)SatelliteProvider.Api/Program.cs(handler property access updated)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/Models.cs(test-side DTO mirror updated)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/RegionTests.cs(happy-path uses new property names)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/IdempotentPostTests.cs(JSON payloadlat/lon)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/SecurityTests.cs(JSON payloadlat/lon)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/RegionFieldRenameTests.cs(new — AZ-812 AC-4 coverage)SatelliteProvider.IntegrationTests/Program.cs(smoke + full suite wired to callRegionFieldRenameTests.RunAll)scripts/run-performance-tests.sh(PT-03/04/05/07 JSON bodies updated tolat/lon)_docs/02_document/modules/common_dtos.md(RequestRegionRequest section added; RegionRequest disambiguated as internal queue type)_docs/02_document/modules/api_program.md(RequestRegionRequest moved from Local Records to Common/DTO section)
Test Evidence
./scripts/run-tests.sh --smoke (integration-tests container exit code 0):
Test: Region endpoint OSM field-name rename (AZ-812)
====================================================
AZ-812 AC-4 (positive): new {lat,lon} wire format → HTTP 200
✓ {lat,lon} body accepted with HTTP 200
AZ-812 AC-4 (negative): legacy {latitude,longitude} wire format → HTTP 400 (UnmappedMemberHandling.Disallow)
✓ Legacy {latitude,longitude} body rejected with HTTP 400; errors map names the unknown field
✓ Region field-rename tests: PASSED
No regressions: cycle-7 inventory validation suite, idempotent POST, security, route, tile, leaflet path, and migrations 012/013/014 all green in the same smoke run.
Verdict Logic
- No Critical, no High, no Medium findings.
- 1 Low finding (DRY in test helpers) — does not block.
- PASS_WITH_WARNINGS.