Files
annotations/.cursor/skills/decompose/SKILL.md
T
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh 9e7dc290db Refactor annotation tool from WPF desktop app to .NET API
Replace the WPF desktop application (Azaion.Suite, Azaion.Annotator,
Azaion.Common, Azaion.Inference, Azaion.Loader, Azaion.LoaderUI,
Azaion.Dataset, Azaion.Test) with a standalone .NET Web API in src/.

Made-with: Cursor
2026-03-25 04:40:03 +02:00

282 lines
13 KiB
Markdown

---
name: decompose
description: |
Decompose planned components into atomic implementable features with bootstrap structure plan.
4-step workflow: bootstrap structure plan, feature decomposition, cross-component verification, and Jira task creation.
Supports project mode (_docs/ structure), single component mode, and standalone mode (@file.md).
Trigger phrases:
- "decompose", "decompose features", "feature decomposition"
- "task decomposition", "break down components"
- "prepare for implementation"
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Feature Decomposition
Decompose planned components into atomic, implementable feature specs with a bootstrap structure plan through a systematic workflow.
## Core Principles
- **Atomic features**: each feature does one thing; if it exceeds 5 complexity points, split it
- **Behavioral specs, not implementation plans**: describe what the system should do, not how to build it
- **Save immediately**: write artifacts to disk after each component; never accumulate unsaved work
- **Ask, don't assume**: when requirements are ambiguous, ask the user before proceeding
- **Plan, don't code**: this workflow produces documents and Jira tasks, never implementation code
## Context Resolution
Determine the operating mode based on invocation before any other logic runs.
**Full project mode** (no explicit input file provided):
- PLANS_DIR: `_docs/02_plans/`
- TASKS_DIR: `_docs/02_tasks/`
- Reads from: `_docs/00_problem/`, `_docs/01_solution/`, PLANS_DIR
- Runs Step 1 (bootstrap) + Step 2 (all components) + Step 3 (cross-verification) + Step 4 (Jira)
**Single component mode** (provided file is within `_docs/02_plans/` and inside a `components/` subdirectory):
- PLANS_DIR: `_docs/02_plans/`
- TASKS_DIR: `_docs/02_tasks/`
- Derive `<topic>`, component number, and component name from the file path
- Ask user for the parent Epic ID
- Runs Step 2 (that component only) + Step 4 (Jira)
- Overwrites existing feature files in that component's TASKS_DIR subdirectory
**Standalone mode** (explicit input file provided, not within `_docs/02_plans/`):
- INPUT_FILE: the provided file (treated as a component spec)
- Derive `<topic>` from the input filename (without extension)
- TASKS_DIR: `_standalone/<topic>/tasks/`
- Guardrails relaxed: only INPUT_FILE must exist and be non-empty
- Ask user for the parent Epic ID
- Runs Step 2 (that component only) + Step 4 (Jira)
Announce the detected mode and resolved paths to the user before proceeding.
## Input Specification
### Required Files
**Full project mode:**
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| `_docs/00_problem/problem.md` | Problem description and context |
| `_docs/00_problem/restrictions.md` | Constraints and limitations (if available) |
| `_docs/00_problem/acceptance_criteria.md` | Measurable acceptance criteria (if available) |
| `_docs/01_solution/solution.md` | Finalized solution |
| `PLANS_DIR/<topic>/architecture.md` | Architecture from plan skill |
| `PLANS_DIR/<topic>/system-flows.md` | System flows from plan skill |
| `PLANS_DIR/<topic>/components/[##]_[name]/description.md` | Component specs from plan skill |
**Single component mode:**
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| The provided component `description.md` | Component spec to decompose |
| Corresponding `tests.md` in the same directory (if available) | Test specs for context |
**Standalone mode:**
| File | Purpose |
|------|---------|
| INPUT_FILE (the provided file) | Component spec to decompose |
### Prerequisite Checks (BLOCKING)
**Full project mode:**
1. At least one `<topic>/` directory exists under PLANS_DIR with `architecture.md` and `components/`**STOP if missing**
2. If multiple topics exist, ask user which one to decompose
3. Create TASKS_DIR if it does not exist
4. If `TASKS_DIR/<topic>/` already exists, ask user: **resume from last checkpoint or start fresh?**
**Single component mode:**
1. The provided component file exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
2. Create the component's subdirectory under TASKS_DIR if it does not exist
**Standalone mode:**
1. INPUT_FILE exists and is non-empty — **STOP if missing**
2. Create TASKS_DIR if it does not exist
## Artifact Management
### Directory Structure
```
TASKS_DIR/<topic>/
├── initial_structure.md (Step 1, full mode only)
├── cross_dependencies.md (Step 3, full mode only)
├── SUMMARY.md (final)
├── [##]_[component_name]/
│ ├── [##].[##]_feature_[feature_name].md
│ ├── [##].[##]_feature_[feature_name].md
│ └── ...
├── [##]_[component_name]/
│ └── ...
└── ...
```
### Save Timing
| Step | Save immediately after | Filename |
|------|------------------------|----------|
| Step 1 | Bootstrap structure plan complete | `initial_structure.md` |
| Step 2 | Each component decomposed | `[##]_[name]/[##].[##]_feature_[feature_name].md` |
| Step 3 | Cross-component verification complete | `cross_dependencies.md` |
| Step 4 | Jira tasks created | Jira via MCP |
| Final | All steps complete | `SUMMARY.md` |
### Resumability
If `TASKS_DIR/<topic>/` already contains artifacts:
1. List existing files and match them to the save timing table
2. Identify the last completed component based on which feature files exist
3. Resume from the next incomplete component
4. Inform the user which components are being skipped
## Progress Tracking
At the start of execution, create a TodoWrite with all applicable steps. Update status as each step/component completes.
## Workflow
### Step 1: Bootstrap Structure Plan (full project mode only)
**Role**: Professional software architect
**Goal**: Produce `initial_structure.md` describing the project skeleton for implementation
**Constraints**: This is a plan document, not code. The `implement-initial` command executes it.
1. Read architecture.md, all component specs, and system-flows.md from PLANS_DIR
2. Read problem, solution, and restrictions from `_docs/00_problem/` and `_docs/01_solution/`
3. Research best implementation patterns for the identified tech stack
4. Document the structure plan using `templates/initial-structure.md`
**Self-verification**:
- [ ] All components have corresponding folders in the layout
- [ ] All inter-component interfaces have DTOs defined
- [ ] CI/CD stages cover build, lint, test, security, deploy
- [ ] Environment strategy covers dev, staging, production
- [ ] Test structure includes unit and integration test locations
**Save action**: Write `initial_structure.md`
**BLOCKING**: Present structure plan summary to user. Do NOT proceed until user confirms.
---
### Step 2: Feature Decomposition (all modes)
**Role**: Professional software architect
**Goal**: Decompose each component into atomic, implementable feature specs
**Constraints**: Behavioral specs only — describe what, not how. No implementation code.
For each component (or the single provided component):
1. Read the component's `description.md` and `tests.md` (if available)
2. Decompose into atomic features; create only 1 feature if the component is simple or atomic
3. Split into multiple features only when it is necessary and would be easier to implement
4. Do not create features of other components — only features of the current component
5. Each feature should be atomic, containing 0 APIs or a list of semantically connected APIs
6. Write each feature spec using `templates/feature-spec.md`
7. Estimate complexity per feature (1, 2, 3, 5 points); no feature should exceed 5 points — split if it does
8. Note feature dependencies (within component and cross-component)
**Self-verification** (per component):
- [ ] Every feature is atomic (single concern)
- [ ] No feature exceeds 5 complexity points
- [ ] Feature dependencies are noted
- [ ] Features cover all interfaces defined in the component spec
- [ ] No features duplicate work from other components
**Save action**: Write each `[##]_[name]/[##].[##]_feature_[feature_name].md`
---
### Step 3: Cross-Component Verification (full project mode only)
**Role**: Professional software architect and analyst
**Goal**: Verify feature consistency across all components
**Constraints**: Review step — fix gaps found, do not add new features
1. Verify feature dependencies across all components are consistent
2. Check no gaps: every interface in architecture.md has features covering it
3. Check no overlaps: features don't duplicate work across components
4. Produce dependency matrix showing cross-component feature dependencies
5. Determine recommended implementation order based on dependencies
**Self-verification**:
- [ ] Every architecture interface is covered by at least one feature
- [ ] No circular feature dependencies across components
- [ ] Cross-component dependencies are explicitly noted in affected feature specs
**Save action**: Write `cross_dependencies.md`
**BLOCKING**: Present cross-component summary to user. Do NOT proceed until user confirms.
---
### Step 4: Jira Tasks (all modes)
**Role**: Professional product manager
**Goal**: Create Jira tasks from feature specs under the appropriate parent epics
**Constraints**: Be concise — fewer words with the same meaning is better
1. For each feature spec, create a Jira task following the parsing rules and field mapping from `gen_jira_task_and_branch.md` (skip branch creation and file renaming — those happen during implementation)
2. In full mode: search Jira for epics matching component names/labels to find parent epic IDs
3. In single component mode: use the Epic ID obtained during context resolution
4. In standalone mode: use the Epic ID obtained during context resolution
5. Do NOT create git branches or rename files — that happens during implementation
**Self-verification**:
- [ ] Every feature has a corresponding Jira task
- [ ] Every task is linked to the correct parent epic
- [ ] Task descriptions match feature spec content
**Save action**: Jira tasks created via MCP
---
## Summary Report
After all steps complete, write `SUMMARY.md` using `templates/summary.md` as structure.
## Common Mistakes
- **Coding during decomposition**: this workflow produces specs, never code
- **Over-splitting**: don't create many features if the component is simple — 1 feature is fine
- **Features exceeding 5 points**: split them; no feature should be too complex for a single task
- **Cross-component features**: each feature belongs to exactly one component
- **Skipping BLOCKING gates**: never proceed past a BLOCKING marker without user confirmation
- **Creating git branches**: branch creation is an implementation concern, not a decomposition one
## Escalation Rules
| Situation | Action |
|-----------|--------|
| Ambiguous component boundaries | ASK user |
| Feature complexity exceeds 5 points after splitting | ASK user |
| Missing component specs in PLANS_DIR | ASK user |
| Cross-component dependency conflict | ASK user |
| Jira epic not found for a component | ASK user for Epic ID |
| Component naming | PROCEED, confirm at next BLOCKING gate |
## Methodology Quick Reference
```
┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Feature Decomposition (4-Step Method) │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ CONTEXT: Resolve mode (full / single component / standalone) │
│ 1. Bootstrap Structure → initial_structure.md (full only) │
│ [BLOCKING: user confirms structure] │
│ 2. Feature Decompose → [##]_[name]/[##].[##]_feature_* │
│ 3. Cross-Verification → cross_dependencies.md (full only) │
│ [BLOCKING: user confirms dependencies] │
│ 4. Jira Tasks → Jira via MCP │
│ ───────────────────────────────────────────────── │
│ Summary → SUMMARY.md │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Principles: Atomic features · Behavioral specs · Save now │
│ Ask don't assume · Plan don't code │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```