Files
detections/.cursor/skills/blackbox-test-spec/SKILL.md
T

10 KiB

name, description, category, tags, disable-model-invocation
name description category tags disable-model-invocation
blackbox-test-spec Black-box integration test specification skill. Analyzes input data completeness and produces detailed E2E test scenarios (functional + non-functional) that treat the system as a black box. 2-phase workflow: input data completeness analysis, then test scenario specification. Produces 5 artifacts under integration_tests/. Trigger phrases: - "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec" - "test specification", "e2e test spec" - "test scenarios", "black box scenarios" build
testing
black-box
integration-tests
e2e
test-specification
qa
true

Black-Box Test Scenario Specification

Analyze input data completeness and produce detailed black-box integration test specifications. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs — they never reference internals.

Core Principles

  • Black-box only: tests describe observable behavior through public interfaces; no internal implementation details
  • Traceability: every test traces to at least one acceptance criterion or restriction
  • Save immediately: write artifacts to disk after each phase; never accumulate unsaved work
  • Ask, don't assume: when requirements are ambiguous, ask the user before proceeding
  • Spec, don't code: this workflow produces test specifications, never test implementation code

Context Resolution

Fixed paths — no mode detection needed:

  • PROBLEM_DIR: _docs/00_problem/
  • SOLUTION_DIR: _docs/01_solution/
  • DOCUMENT_DIR: _docs/02_document/
  • TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR: _docs/02_document/integration_tests/

Announce the resolved paths to the user before proceeding.

Input Specification

Required Files

File Purpose
_docs/00_problem/problem.md Problem description and context
_docs/00_problem/acceptance_criteria.md Measurable acceptance criteria
_docs/00_problem/restrictions.md Constraints and limitations
_docs/00_problem/input_data/ Reference data examples
_docs/01_solution/solution.md Finalized solution

Optional Files (used when available)

File Purpose
DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.md System architecture for environment design
DOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.md System flows for test scenario coverage
DOCUMENT_DIR/components/ Component specs for interface identification

Prerequisite Checks (BLOCKING)

  1. acceptance_criteria.md exists and is non-empty — STOP if missing
  2. restrictions.md exists and is non-empty — STOP if missing
  3. input_data/ exists and contains at least one file — STOP if missing
  4. problem.md exists and is non-empty — STOP if missing
  5. solution.md exists and is non-empty — STOP if missing
  6. Create TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR if it does not exist
  7. If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files, ask user: resume from last checkpoint or start fresh?

Artifact Management

Directory Structure

TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR/
├── environment.md
├── test_data.md
├── functional_tests.md
├── non_functional_tests.md
└── traceability_matrix.md

Save Timing

Phase Save immediately after Filename
Phase 1a Input data analysis (no file — findings feed Phase 1b)
Phase 1b Environment spec environment.md
Phase 1b Test data spec test_data.md
Phase 1b Functional tests functional_tests.md
Phase 1b Non-functional tests non_functional_tests.md
Phase 1b Traceability matrix traceability_matrix.md

Resumability

If TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR already contains files:

  1. List existing files and match them to the save timing table above
  2. Identify which phase/artifacts are complete
  3. Resume from the next incomplete artifact
  4. Inform the user which artifacts are being skipped

Progress Tracking

At the start of execution, create a TodoWrite with both phases. Update status as each phase completes.

Workflow

Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis

Role: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer Goal: Assess whether the available input data is sufficient to build comprehensive test scenarios Constraints: Analysis only — no test specs yet

  1. Read _docs/01_solution/solution.md
  2. Read acceptance_criteria.md, restrictions.md
  3. Read testing strategy from solution.md (if present)
  4. If DOCUMENT_DIR/architecture.md and DOCUMENT_DIR/system-flows.md exist, read them for additional context on system interfaces and flows
  5. Analyze input_data/ contents against:
    • Coverage of acceptance criteria scenarios
    • Coverage of restriction edge cases
    • Coverage of testing strategy requirements
  6. Threshold: at least 70% coverage of the scenarios
  7. If coverage is low, search the internet for supplementary data, assess quality with user, and if user agrees, add to input_data/
  8. Present coverage assessment to user

BLOCKING: Do NOT proceed until user confirms the input data coverage is sufficient.


Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification

Role: Professional Quality Assurance Engineer Goal: Produce detailed black-box test specifications covering functional and non-functional scenarios Constraints: Spec only — no test code. Tests describe what the system should do given specific inputs, not how the system is built.

Based on all acquired data, acceptance_criteria, and restrictions, form detailed test scenarios:

  1. Define test environment using .cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-environment.md as structure
  2. Define test data management using .cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-test-data.md as structure
  3. Write functional test scenarios (positive + negative) using .cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-functional-tests.md as structure
  4. Write non-functional test scenarios (performance, resilience, security, edge cases) using .cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-non-functional-tests.md as structure
  5. Build traceability matrix using .cursor/skills/plan/templates/integration-traceability-matrix.md as structure

Self-verification:

  • Every acceptance criterion is covered by at least one test scenario
  • Every restriction is verified by at least one test scenario
  • Positive and negative scenarios are balanced
  • Consumer app has no direct access to system internals
  • Docker environment is self-contained (docker compose up sufficient)
  • External dependencies have mock/stub services defined
  • Traceability matrix has no uncovered AC or restrictions

Save action: Write all files under TESTS_OUTPUT_DIR:

  • environment.md
  • test_data.md
  • functional_tests.md
  • non_functional_tests.md
  • traceability_matrix.md

BLOCKING: Present test coverage summary (from traceability_matrix.md) to user. Do NOT proceed until confirmed.

Capture any new questions, findings, or insights that arise during test specification — these feed forward into downstream skills (plan, refactor, etc.).


Escalation Rules

Situation Action
Missing acceptance_criteria.md, restrictions.md, or input_data/ STOP — specification cannot proceed
Ambiguous requirements ASK user
Input data coverage below 70% Search internet for supplementary data, ASK user to validate
Test scenario conflicts with restrictions ASK user to clarify intent
System interfaces unclear (no architecture.md) ASK user or derive from solution.md

Common Mistakes

  • Referencing internals: tests must be black-box — no internal module names, no direct DB queries against the system under test
  • Vague expected outcomes: "works correctly" is not a test outcome; use specific measurable values
  • Missing negative scenarios: every positive scenario category should have corresponding negative/edge-case tests
  • Untraceable tests: every test should trace to at least one AC or restriction
  • Writing test code: this skill produces specifications, never implementation code

Trigger Conditions

When the user wants to:

  • Specify black-box integration tests before implementation or refactoring
  • Analyze input data completeness for test coverage
  • Produce E2E test scenarios from acceptance criteria

Keywords: "blackbox test spec", "black box tests", "integration test spec", "test specification", "e2e test spec", "test scenarios"

Methodology Quick Reference

┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│       Black-Box Test Scenario Specification (2-Phase)           │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ PREREQ: Data Gate (BLOCKING)                                    │
│   → verify AC, restrictions, input_data, solution exist         │
│                                                                │
│ Phase 1a: Input Data Completeness Analysis                      │
│   → assess input_data/ coverage vs AC scenarios (≥70%)          │
│   [BLOCKING: user confirms input data coverage]                │
│                                                                │
│ Phase 1b: Black-Box Test Scenario Specification                 │
│   → environment.md                                              │
│   → test_data.md                                                │
│   → functional_tests.md (positive + negative)                   │
│   → non_functional_tests.md (perf, resilience, security, limits)│
│   → traceability_matrix.md                                      │
│   [BLOCKING: user confirms test coverage]                      │
├────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ Principles: Black-box only · Traceability · Save immediately    │
│             Ask don't assume · Spec don't code                  │
└────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘