mirror of
https://github.com/azaion/detections.git
synced 2026-04-23 07:16:33 +00:00
5a968edcba
- Added Cython generated files to .gitignore to prevent unnecessary tracking. - Updated paths in `inference.c` and `coreml_engine.c` to reflect the correct virtual environment. - Revised the execution environment documentation to clarify hardware dependency checks and local execution instructions, ensuring accurate guidance for users. - Removed outdated Docker suitability checks and streamlined the assessment process for test execution environments.
99 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
99 lines
4.6 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: test-run
|
|
description: |
|
|
Run the project's test suite, report results, and handle failures.
|
|
Detects test runners automatically (pytest, dotnet test, cargo test, npm test)
|
|
or uses scripts/run-tests.sh if available.
|
|
Trigger phrases:
|
|
- "run tests", "test suite", "verify tests"
|
|
category: build
|
|
tags: [testing, verification, test-suite]
|
|
disable-model-invocation: true
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# Test Run
|
|
|
|
Run the project's test suite and report results. This skill is invoked by the autopilot at verification checkpoints — after implementing tests, after implementing features, or at any point where the test suite must pass before proceeding.
|
|
|
|
## Workflow
|
|
|
|
### 1. Detect Test Runner
|
|
|
|
Check in order — first match wins:
|
|
|
|
1. `scripts/run-tests.sh` exists → use it (the script already encodes the correct execution strategy)
|
|
2. `docker-compose.test.yml` exists → run the Docker Suitability Check (see below). Docker is preferred; use it unless hardware constraints prevent it.
|
|
3. Auto-detect from project files:
|
|
- `pytest.ini`, `pyproject.toml` with `[tool.pytest]`, or `conftest.py` → `pytest`
|
|
- `*.csproj` or `*.sln` → `dotnet test`
|
|
- `Cargo.toml` → `cargo test`
|
|
- `package.json` with test script → `npm test`
|
|
- `Makefile` with `test` target → `make test`
|
|
|
|
If no runner detected → report failure and ask user to specify.
|
|
|
|
#### Execution Environment Check
|
|
|
|
1. Check `_docs/02_document/tests/environment.md` for a "Test Execution" section. If the test-spec skill already assessed hardware dependencies and recorded a decision (local / docker / both), **follow that decision**.
|
|
2. If the "Test Execution" section says **local** → run tests directly on host (no Docker).
|
|
3. If the "Test Execution" section says **docker** → use Docker (docker-compose).
|
|
4. If the "Test Execution" section says **both** → run local first, then Docker (or vice versa), and merge results.
|
|
5. If no prior decision exists → fall back to the hardware-dependency detection logic from the test-spec skill's "Hardware-Dependency & Execution Environment Assessment" section. Ask the user if hardware indicators are found.
|
|
|
|
### 2. Run Tests
|
|
|
|
1. Execute the detected test runner
|
|
2. Capture output: passed, failed, skipped, errors
|
|
3. If a test environment was spun up, tear it down after tests complete
|
|
|
|
### 3. Report Results
|
|
|
|
Present a summary:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
TEST RESULTS: [N passed, M failed, K skipped, E errors]
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Important**: Collection errors (import failures, missing dependencies, syntax errors) count as failures — they are not "skipped" or ignorable.
|
|
|
|
### 4. Diagnose Failures
|
|
|
|
Before presenting choices, list every failing/erroring test with a one-line root cause:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
Failures:
|
|
1. test_foo.py::test_bar — missing dependency 'netron' (not installed)
|
|
2. test_baz.py::test_qux — AssertionError: expected 5, got 3 (logic error)
|
|
3. test_old.py::test_legacy — ImportError: no module 'removed_module' (possibly obsolete)
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
Categorize each as: **missing dependency**, **broken import**, **logic/assertion error**, **possibly obsolete**, or **environment-specific**.
|
|
|
|
### 5. Handle Outcome
|
|
|
|
**All tests pass** → return success to the autopilot for auto-chain.
|
|
|
|
**Any test fails or errors** → this is a **blocking gate**. Never silently ignore or skip failures. Present using Choose format:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
TEST RESULTS: [N passed, M failed, K skipped, E errors]
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
A) Investigate and fix failing tests/code, then re-run
|
|
B) Remove obsolete tests (if diagnosis shows they are no longer relevant)
|
|
C) Abort — fix manually
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
Recommendation: A — fix failures before proceeding
|
|
══════════════════════════════════════
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- If user picks A → investigate root causes, attempt fixes, then re-run (loop back to step 2)
|
|
- If user picks B → confirm which tests to remove, delete them, then re-run (loop back to step 2)
|
|
- If user picks C → return failure to the autopilot
|
|
|
|
## Trigger Conditions
|
|
|
|
This skill is invoked by the autopilot at test verification checkpoints. It is not typically invoked directly by the user.
|