azaion/gps-denied-onboard
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/azaion/gps-denied-onboard.git synced 2026-06-22 19:41:14 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

chore: WIP pre-implement

Browse Source 
Bundled hygiene commit before cycle-3 /implement (AZ-776, AZ-777). Mixes
two concerns by user choice (autodev option B):

- Cycle-3 autodev artifacts not yet committed by Step 9 (new-task):
  task specs for AZ-776 / AZ-777 under _docs/02_tasks/todo/ and the
  updated _docs/02_tasks/_dependencies_table.md.
- Accumulated skill / rule tooling maintenance under .cursor/ (skills:
  autodev, code-review, decompose, deploy, implement, new-task, plan,
  refactor, retrospective, test-spec; rules: coderule, cursor-meta,
  meta-rule, testing; new release skill scaffolding).
- Autodev bootstrap state: _docs/_autodev_state.md (step 10 in_progress)
  and _docs/_process_leftovers/2026-05-11_d_cross_cve_1_opencv_pin_deferred.md
  (replay timestamp refreshed; gtsam 4.2 still numpy<2-only).

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
2026-05-21 13:14:11 +03:00
parent 9bc170ffe0
commit 6044a33197
36 changed files with 1559 additions and 252 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files
.cursor/rules/testing.mdc
+1 -1
View File
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ globs: ["**/*test*", "**/*spec*", "**/*Test*", "**/tests/**", "**/test/**"]
- One assertion per test when practical; name tests descriptively: `MethodName_Scenario_ExpectedResult`
- Test boundary conditions, error paths, and happy paths
- Use mocks only for external dependencies; prefer real implementations for internal code
- Aim for 75%+ coverage on business logic; 100% on critical paths (code paths where a bug would cause data loss, security breaches, financial errors, or system outages — identify from acceptance criteria marked as must-have or from security_approach.md). The 75% threshold is canonical — see `cursor-meta.mdc` Quality Thresholds.
- Aim for 75%+ coverage on business logic; **90% floor / 100% aim on critical paths** (code paths where a bug would cause data loss, security breaches, financial errors, or system outages — identify from acceptance criteria marked as must-have or from `security_approach.md`). 90% is the enforcement floor (blocking in CI / refactor verification / release pre-flight); 100% is the aspirational aim — drift below 100% but at-or-above 90% is acceptable. Both numbers are canonical — see `cursor-meta.mdc` Quality Thresholds.
- Integration tests use real database (Postgres testcontainers or dedicated test DB)
- Never use Thread Sleep or fixed delays in tests; use polling or async waits
- Keep test data factories/builders for reusable test setup