mirror of
https://github.com/azaion/gps-denied-onboard.git
synced 2026-06-22 08:51:12 +00:00
[AZ-240] Update product implementation and task decomposition processes
- Refined task decomposition steps to ensure implementation tasks are atomic and complexity does not exceed 5 points. - Enhanced the product implementation process with a completeness gate to verify task outcomes against architecture promises before proceeding to testing. - Updated dependencies table to reflect new tasks and their relationships, ensuring all test tasks are linked to product remediation tasks. - Adjusted workflow documentation to clarify entry points for task decomposition and implementation contexts. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
@@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
|
||||
# Implementation Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Feature**: Product runtime
|
||||
**Cycle**: 1
|
||||
**Date**: 2026-05-04
|
||||
**Status**: Superseded — remediation pending
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Greenfield product implementation completed the initial GPS-denied onboard runtime scaffold and component behavior tasks. Later product verification identified required remediation work before the flow can advance to testability revision.
|
||||
|
||||
- Total tasks completed: 14
|
||||
- Completed batches: 9
|
||||
- Blocked tasks: 0
|
||||
- Code review verdicts: PASS for all batch reviews and cumulative review
|
||||
- Final test run: 49 passed
|
||||
|
||||
## Completed Tasks
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Name | Batch | Status |
|
||||
|------|------|-------|--------|
|
||||
| AZ-219 | initial_structure | 1 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-220 | shared_runtime_contracts | 2 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-221 | shared_geometry_time_sync | 3 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-222 | runtime_config_errors_telemetry | 3 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-223 | camera_ingest_calibration | 4 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-224 | mavlink_gcs_gateway | 4 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-225 | tile_manager_cache_manifest | 4 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-227 | fdr_event_recorder | 4 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-226 | generated_tile_orthorectification | 5 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-228 | vio_adapter | 6 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-229 | satellite_service_sync | 6 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-230 | satellite_service_vpr_retrieval | 7 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-231 | anchor_verification_matching | 8 | Done |
|
||||
| AZ-232 | safety_anchor_state_machine | 9 | Done |
|
||||
|
||||
## Batch Outcomes
|
||||
|
||||
| Batch | Tasks | Code Review | Tests |
|
||||
|-------|-------|-------------|-------|
|
||||
| 1 | AZ-219_initial_structure | PASS | 5 passed |
|
||||
| 2 | AZ-220_shared_runtime_contracts | PASS | 11 passed |
|
||||
| 3 | AZ-221_shared_geometry_time_sync, AZ-222_runtime_config_errors_telemetry | PASS | 17 passed |
|
||||
| 4 | AZ-223_camera_ingest_calibration, AZ-224_mavlink_gcs_gateway, AZ-225_tile_manager_cache_manifest, AZ-227_fdr_event_recorder | PASS | 29 passed |
|
||||
| 5 | AZ-226_generated_tile_orthorectification | PASS | 32 passed |
|
||||
| 6 | AZ-228_vio_adapter, AZ-229_satellite_service_sync | PASS | 38 passed |
|
||||
| 7 | AZ-230_satellite_service_vpr_retrieval | PASS | 42 passed |
|
||||
| 8 | AZ-231_anchor_verification_matching | PASS | 45 passed |
|
||||
| 9 | AZ-232_safety_anchor_state_machine | PASS | 49 passed |
|
||||
|
||||
## Acceptance Coverage
|
||||
|
||||
All acceptance criteria documented in the product implementation task specs are covered by tests recorded in the batch reports:
|
||||
|
||||
- Shared contracts, configuration, errors, telemetry, geometry, and time-sync behavior are validated by shared unit tests.
|
||||
- Component runtime boundaries for camera ingest, MAVLink/GCS, tile management, FDR, VIO, Satellite Service, anchor verification, and safety/anchor state management are validated by component unit tests.
|
||||
- Safety-critical behavior for explicit errors, no raw-frame retention, no mid-flight Satellite Service calls, conservative generated-tile writes, rejected unsafe anchors, monotonic blackout degradation, and honest covariance is covered by the current unit suite.
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- Batch reviews: `_docs/03_implementation/reviews/batch_01_review.md` through `_docs/03_implementation/reviews/batch_09_review.md`
|
||||
- Cumulative review: `_docs/03_implementation/reviews/cumulative_review_batches_01-09_cycle1_report.md`
|
||||
- Auto-fix attempts: 0 across all batches
|
||||
- Stuck agents: none
|
||||
|
||||
## Final Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m black --check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m pytest` passed: 49 tests.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Step
|
||||
|
||||
Autodev should remain at Step 7, Implement, until remediation tasks AZ-240 through AZ-242 are implemented and the Product Implementation Completeness Gate produces `_docs/03_implementation/implementation_completeness_cycle1_report.md` without unresolved `FAIL` classifications.
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
|
||||
# Code Review Report
|
||||
|
||||
**Batch**: cumulative batches 01-09, cycle 1
|
||||
**Date**: 2026-05-04
|
||||
**Verdict**: PASS
|
||||
|
||||
## Scope
|
||||
|
||||
- Task specs reviewed: AZ-219 through AZ-232.
|
||||
- Batch reports reviewed: `_docs/03_implementation/batch_01_cycle1_report.md` through `_docs/03_implementation/batch_09_cycle1_report.md`.
|
||||
- Code scope reviewed: `src/`, `tests/`, and `e2e/replay`.
|
||||
- Architecture references reviewed: `_docs/02_document/architecture.md` and `_docs/02_document/module-layout.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Findings
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Severity | Category | File:Line | Title |
|
||||
|---|----------|----------|-----------|-------|
|
||||
| - | - | - | - | No findings |
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Context Loading
|
||||
|
||||
All 14 product implementation tasks, the project restrictions, the solution overview, module layout, architecture, and batch reports were reviewed.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Spec Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
Every task acceptance criterion is covered by the per-batch reports and unit tests. The final full suite passed with 49 tests.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Code Quality
|
||||
|
||||
Formatter and lint checks passed:
|
||||
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m black --check src tests e2e/replay`
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check src tests e2e/replay`
|
||||
|
||||
No dead imports, style errors, or obvious duplicated component-local contract shapes were found.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Security Quick-Scan
|
||||
|
||||
No hardcoded secrets, `eval`, `exec`, shell subprocess usage, insecure deserialization, or sensitive-data logging patterns were found in `src/`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Performance Scan
|
||||
|
||||
The implemented code remains lightweight and trigger-oriented for the current scaffold/runtime-contract level. Heavy VPR, matching, Jetson, SITL, and endurance profiling remain release-gate work for later test implementation and deploy phases.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 6: Cross-Task Consistency
|
||||
|
||||
Shared DTOs and component interfaces are consistently consumed through public package surfaces. Batch-level reports show all dependencies were implemented before consumers.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 7: Architecture Compliance
|
||||
|
||||
Observed imports align with the component public API layout:
|
||||
|
||||
- Runtime components import shared helpers and contracts through `shared/*` public modules.
|
||||
- Cross-component imports use package-level public exports such as `tile_manager`, not internal component files.
|
||||
- No component imports from `internal/`, `_*.py`, or native bridge paths owned by another component.
|
||||
|
||||
No architecture baseline file exists, so no baseline delta section is required.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification
|
||||
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m black --check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
|
||||
- `.venv/bin/python -m pytest` passed: 49 tests.
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user