[AZ-240] Update product implementation and task decomposition processes

- Refined task decomposition steps to ensure implementation tasks are atomic and complexity does not exceed 5 points.
- Enhanced the product implementation process with a completeness gate to verify task outcomes against architecture promises before proceeding to testing.
- Updated dependencies table to reflect new tasks and their relationships, ensuring all test tasks are linked to product remediation tasks.
- Adjusted workflow documentation to clarify entry points for task decomposition and implementation contexts.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
This commit is contained in:
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh
2026-05-05 01:02:25 +03:00
parent 9fb9e4a349
commit 827d4fe644
32 changed files with 1399 additions and 89 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# Code Review Report
**Batch**: cumulative batches 01-09, cycle 1
**Date**: 2026-05-04
**Verdict**: PASS
## Scope
- Task specs reviewed: AZ-219 through AZ-232.
- Batch reports reviewed: `_docs/03_implementation/batch_01_cycle1_report.md` through `_docs/03_implementation/batch_09_cycle1_report.md`.
- Code scope reviewed: `src/`, `tests/`, and `e2e/replay`.
- Architecture references reviewed: `_docs/02_document/architecture.md` and `_docs/02_document/module-layout.md`.
## Findings
| # | Severity | Category | File:Line | Title |
|---|----------|----------|-----------|-------|
| - | - | - | - | No findings |
## Phase Results
### Phase 1: Context Loading
All 14 product implementation tasks, the project restrictions, the solution overview, module layout, architecture, and batch reports were reviewed.
### Phase 2: Spec Compliance
Every task acceptance criterion is covered by the per-batch reports and unit tests. The final full suite passed with 49 tests.
### Phase 3: Code Quality
Formatter and lint checks passed:
- `.venv/bin/python -m black --check src tests e2e/replay`
- `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check src tests e2e/replay`
No dead imports, style errors, or obvious duplicated component-local contract shapes were found.
### Phase 4: Security Quick-Scan
No hardcoded secrets, `eval`, `exec`, shell subprocess usage, insecure deserialization, or sensitive-data logging patterns were found in `src/`.
### Phase 5: Performance Scan
The implemented code remains lightweight and trigger-oriented for the current scaffold/runtime-contract level. Heavy VPR, matching, Jetson, SITL, and endurance profiling remain release-gate work for later test implementation and deploy phases.
### Phase 6: Cross-Task Consistency
Shared DTOs and component interfaces are consistently consumed through public package surfaces. Batch-level reports show all dependencies were implemented before consumers.
### Phase 7: Architecture Compliance
Observed imports align with the component public API layout:
- Runtime components import shared helpers and contracts through `shared/*` public modules.
- Cross-component imports use package-level public exports such as `tile_manager`, not internal component files.
- No component imports from `internal/`, `_*.py`, or native bridge paths owned by another component.
No architecture baseline file exists, so no baseline delta section is required.
## Verification
- `.venv/bin/python -m black --check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
- `.venv/bin/python -m ruff check src tests e2e/replay` passed.
- `.venv/bin/python -m pytest` passed: 49 tests.