mirror of
https://github.com/azaion/satellite-provider.git
synced 2026-06-21 08:41:13 +00:00
51b572108a
Captures the post-implementation autodev gates for AZ-484 multi-source tile storage: - Step 12 (Test-Spec Sync): added 7 AC rows (AZ-484 AC-1..AC-7) and a PT-07 NFR row to traceability-matrix.md; added PT-07 scenario to performance-tests.md. - Step 13 (Update Docs): refreshed data_model.md (tiles columns + indexes + selection rule + UPSERT contract + migrations 012/013), module-layout.md (Common/Enums section with L-001 guidance, DataAccess imports-from now lists 6 sites), 6 module / component docs to reflect the new repo signatures, source/captured_at fields, and Dapper enum bypass workaround. ripple_log_cycle1.md records zero out-of-scope ripple. - Step 14 (Security Audit): PASS_WITH_WARNINGS - 0 Critical, 0 High, 5 Medium, 5 Low. AZ-484 itself added zero new findings. Hardening items (Postgres default creds, .env in build context, GMaps key rotation, ASP.NET Core 8.0.21 -> 8.0.25, rate limiter) recorded for separate tickets. - Step 15 (Performance Test): all PT-01..PT-07 scenarios Unverified (non-blocking); PT-07 baseline-comparison harness deferred to a leftover for next cycle. - Step 16 (Deploy): cycle deploy report covering migration safety, rollback path, post-deploy verification, security caveats. Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
33 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
33 lines
2.7 KiB
Markdown
# Leftover — PT-07 perf harness + cycle 1 perf run
|
|
|
|
- **Timestamp**: 2026-05-11T07:05:00Z
|
|
- **Origin**: autodev cycle 1, Step 15 (Performance Test)
|
|
- **Blocker class**: non-user-input — work was deferred at the Step 15 user gate; no missing user decision blocks completion.
|
|
|
|
## What was deferred
|
|
|
|
1. **PT-07 implementation** in `scripts/run-performance-tests.sh`: capture pre-change baseline for `GetTilesByRegionAsync` p95 latency, run post-change measurement, compute the ratio, and assert `ratio ≤ 1.10`. PT-07 was recorded as a documentation entry during Step 12 (`_docs/02_document/tests/performance-tests.md` + `traceability-matrix.md` "NFRs → Test Mapping" section) but the runner script does not yet have the corresponding scenario.
|
|
2. **Active perf run** of PT-01..PT-06 against the post-AZ-484 build. The runner exists; it requires `docker-compose up` on the dev host. Not executed this cycle (per the meta-rule "ask before kicking off Docker / long-running perf operations").
|
|
|
|
## Why it is safe to defer
|
|
|
|
- AZ-484 functional correctness validated by 5 dedicated AZ-484 integration tests (Step 11). The DB read paths exercised by PT-07 are the same ones exercised by `MostRecentAcrossSourcesSelection_AZ484_AC2` etc.
|
|
- The post-AZ-484 SQL uses the same `idx_tiles_unique_location_source` index as the contract specifies; structurally there is no new full scan, join, or lock added vs. pre-AZ-484.
|
|
- Cycle 1 perf run is recorded as `Unverified` (not `Fail`) per the test-run perf-mode rules — gate does not block deploy.
|
|
|
|
## Replay actions for next /autodev invocation
|
|
|
|
When the next cycle's autodev runs, before any new tracker write or before re-entering Step 15 in cycle 2:
|
|
|
|
1. Add PT-07 to `scripts/run-performance-tests.sh`:
|
|
- Capture a pre-change baseline by checking out the parent of the AZ-484 commit (`git rev-parse HEAD~N` where N points at the AZ-484 batch), running the existing PT-03/PT-04 region scenarios, and recording the `GetTilesByRegionAsync` timings (the repository already logs slow query warnings at >500 ms — extend that log line to include median/p95 captured per call window).
|
|
- Run the post-change measurement against the current `HEAD`.
|
|
- Compute the p95 ratio and fail when `> 1.10`.
|
|
2. Bring up the docker stack (`docker-compose up --build -d`) and run the full perf script with the user's explicit go-ahead.
|
|
3. Capture results into `_docs/06_metrics/perf_<YYYY-MM-DD>_cycle<N>.md`.
|
|
4. Once results are recorded, delete this leftover file.
|
|
|
|
## Tracker action (none required this cycle)
|
|
|
|
This leftover does NOT require a Jira ticket on its own — it tracks deferred process work, not user-visible scope. If the perf comparison reveals a regression next cycle, that finding will create a Jira bug; until then there is nothing to file.
|