Files
satellite-provider/_docs/02_document/04_verification_log.md
T
Oleksandr Bezdieniezhnykh b0fffa6d42 [AZ-284] Autodev baseline + testability refactor
Phase A baseline outputs from /autodev (Steps 1-5):
- Problem & solution docs (_docs/00_problem, _docs/01_solution)
- Codebase documentation (_docs/02_document) incl. architecture,
  module-layout, glossary, system-flows, baseline compliance scan
- Test specs (blackbox, performance, resilience, security, resource,
  traceability matrix)
- Test task decomposition (_docs/02_tasks/todo): AZ-285..AZ-290
- Testability refactor (_docs/04_refactoring/01-testability-refactoring):
  - TC-01 Move DownloadedTileInfoV2 + new ExistingTileInfo to Common.DTO
  - TC-02 Replace dead ISatelliteDownloader API with real signatures
  - TC-03 GoogleMapsDownloaderV2 implements ISatelliteDownloader
  - TC-04 TileService depends on ISatelliteDownloader (mockable)
  - TC-05 DI + endpoints use ISatelliteDownloader
- Test runner scripts (scripts/run-tests.sh, run-performance-tests.sh)
- Autodev state pointer (_docs/_autodev_state.md)

Prepares the codebase for AZ-285..AZ-290 unit/integration test work.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
2026-05-10 04:44:08 +03:00

61 lines
3.1 KiB
Markdown

# Verification Log
## Summary
| Metric | Count |
|--------|-------|
| Code entities verified | 48 |
| Entities flagged (incorrect) | 1 |
| Corrections applied | 1 |
| Remaining gaps | 1 (minor) |
| Completeness | 16/16 modules documented |
## Corrections Applied
### 1. data_model.md — Removed `stitched_image_path` from regions table
**Issue**: Listed `stitched_image_path` as a column on the `regions` table.
**Reality**: `RegionEntity` has no such property. Stitched images for regions are generated to disk but the path is only written to the summary text file, not stored as a DB column. `StitchedImagePath` only exists on `RouteEntity`.
**Fix**: Removed from ERD and table definition in `data_model.md`.
## Entity Verification
All classes, interfaces, and types mentioned in documentation were cross-referenced against the codebase:
- **Entities** (4/4): TileEntity, RegionEntity, RouteEntity, RoutePointEntity ✓
- **Service interfaces** (5/5): ITileService, IRegionService, IRouteService, IRegionRequestQueue, ISatelliteDownloader ✓
- **Service implementations** (7/7): TileService, RegionService, RouteService, GoogleMapsDownloaderV2, RegionProcessingService, RouteProcessingService, RegionRequestQueue ✓
- **Repositories** (6/6): ITileRepository, IRegionRepository, IRouteRepository, TileRepository, RegionRepository, RouteRepository ✓
- **Config classes** (4/4): MapConfig, StorageConfig, ProcessingConfig, DatabaseConfig ✓
- **DTOs** (10/10): GeoPoint, Direction, TileMetadata, RegionRequest, RegionStatus, RouteResponse, RoutePoint, RoutePointDto, CreateRouteRequest, GeofencePolygon ✓
- **Utilities** (1/1): GeoUtils ✓
- **Infrastructure** (1/1): DatabaseMigrator ✓
## Interface Accuracy
All method signatures in component/module docs verified against actual code. No discrepancies found.
## Flow Correctness
- F1 (Single Tile): TileService → TileRepo → GoogleMaps → FileSystem ✓
- F2 (Region Request): RegionService → RegionRepo → Queue ✓
- F3 (Region Processing): BackgroundService → TileService → FileSystem → RegionRepo ✓
- F4 (Route Creation): RouteService → GeoUtils → RouteRepo ✓
- F5 (Route Map Processing): RouteProcessingService → RegionService → Queue → ZIP ✓
- F6 (Status Query): Direct DB lookup ✓
## Remaining Gaps (Minor)
1. **Tile serving endpoint**: `GET /tiles/{z}/{x}/{y}` serves raw tile images from disk. Not documented in system-flows as it's a trivial static file serve. Noted in architecture as implicit.
## Consistency Check
- Component docs ↔ Architecture doc: consistent ✓
- Flow diagrams ↔ Component interfaces: consistent ✓
- Data model ↔ Migration SQL: consistent (after correction) ✓
- Module layout ↔ Actual file paths: consistent ✓
## Note on AGENTS.md Discrepancy
The project's `AGENTS.md` mentions `geofence_polygons` as a field on the `routes` table. This is inaccurate — geofence polygons are passed in `CreateRouteRequest` but are NOT persisted on the routes table. Their effects are stored indirectly via `route_regions.is_geofence` and `route_regions.geofence_polygon_index`. The generated documentation correctly omits this non-existent column.